The exception to a 'fun night out' are the "serious" teams that sandbag and are in the APA with a mission to make it to Vegas, willing to trample on everyone else's fun along the way and do whatever it takes, legal, illegal, ethical, unethical, sportsman or unsportsmanlike. Many have the same traits. Abusers of the rules, while at the same time, they are fanatical sticklers for the rules against your team. They gear up for league night with a "killer" type of mindset. Nothing wrong with competitiveness, but this is a whole other level. Because part of this competitiveness and desire to win leads to highly anti-social behavior such as never talking to the other team all the way to hostility in various forms and a general atmosphere of tension and animosity. Their team is less of a team, and is very clannish.
This is a major turn off, and not even for all those reasons listed above, but due to the extra injury and insult of realizing that such people and teams exist in an amateur fun league like the APA. You look at what the APA is, and then to think there are people that fanatical in such a banger/newbie environment is just pathetic.
Be competitive and improve. No doubt. But such behavior seems so misplaced to me. For example, before I would ever get that way, I would first seek out higher level more competition focused environments. In other words, I wouldn't put in so much effort, energy, time and that kind of mindset just for the APA. I would never do anything unethical or sleazy ever, but to kick it up to that type of level and determination to win would require there be bigger rewards. "A fun night out" is lost on many in the APA.
It's the equivalent of 8 year olds doing steroids to get an edge in the quest for superiority and dominance during dodgeball games at recess.
I think there's another factor in play here. The APA has too many underachievers. Winning and succeeding in the APA, is to them a reflection of their own life. From my observations, I really honestly believe a lot of people base their self worth on their APA pool performance. They failed throughout life, they want to kick ass in the one thing they've clung to as an opportunity. When they win, they are on a euphoric high for a week, when they lose - you see an abnormal response. Disproportionate disappointment, misery, anger and frustration. Their emotional tie to the league, positive or negative outcome, is unhealthy and abnormal. This kind of thing is the motivation for the killer/hostile hypercompetitive nature some teams bring to a night.
I've seen some people derive an excessive amount of gratification and elation from winning or coming in first, it just seems to me like they are making up for something, compensating if you will. Again, I'm not talking normal joy people have from winning, or team successes. I'm discussing those nutjobs and those teams composed of nutjobs that plague and infest the APA and ruin it for others.
Most know what I'm referring to. We've all seen those teams that no one wants to play or be around. These teams often self-destruct when things don't work out. Such as, failure in regionals. All the effort and it falls apart right before the goal is achieved. These nutjobs then, for the first time, truly realize it's a team format. Except, not from the perspective of accepting responsibility as part of a team, or accepting that is how team formats work and that over personalizing something that is team-based is wrong. No. None of that. Instead, it is rationalized as a way to blame a teammate or teammates. For they, in a team format, caused a personal failure for them. So they lash out. It was really a group of fanatics all of whom were in it for the purpose of satisfying or servicing their emotional and psychological problems. It becomes obvious at the lack of "team" when failure comes along. The lack of compassion and thought for others within their team. How selfish, self centered they are. A lot of "I" and "my" flying around. No regard for their own teammates who are also feeling the disappointment. Only anger and hatred because personal goals were, in their view, thwarted by others.
I choose not to be around such scumbags and nutjobs which is one of the various reasons I quit the APA. Unfortunately, some here think I'm attributing this to everyone it the APA. Far from it. Don't flame me or jump on my nuts. I'm not bashing you, unless you feel I described you above. Anyway, these types are a minority. However, for me it's too much. I can't enjoy the 80% of decent people when 20% are as I described above. Life is too short to spend interacting with the losers and scumbags. It only takes a few bums to ruin a party. For some reason, likely the very amateur nature of the APA, it attracts and is a target of quite a few of those people. To them, it's a place where they think they can finally be dominant at something in life.
Well, that sums it up for this installation of my usual APA rants. I leave you folks with yet another attempt to define the APA in a short way....the APA is the manifestation of poorly adjusted children in a sandbox turned into intoxicated adults.