BlueRaider
Registered
Over the holidays, I went to Stroker's in Palm Harbor, FL, while visiting my in-laws with my wife. I didn't bring my cue, so I grabbed a house cue that looked normal at first glance.
But after missing several shots that I'm normally very high percentage on, I checked the cue and realized the tip was extremely rounded. It was basically a perfect dome/half-circle shape. Possibly the most rounded tip I have ever played with.
I didn't want to blame the tip, so I kept shooting with it, and I kept missing far more often than I normally do, and on shots that don't really present much difficulty for me (medium-distance straight-ins and very thick medium-distance cuts). The freshly covered tables at Stroker's were more forgiving than my preferred local table in TN (4.25" pockets with relatively slow, worn cloth), but it wasn't even that I was rattling balls. I was missing by a half-diamond on many shots where distance was remotely a factor.
I only shot for around an hour or so, and I never bothered to switch to a different house cue (partly because I was determined to figure out why I was missing). When I got back to my in-laws' house, I checked to see what Dr. Dave's website says about tip shape and accuracy and found this:
I found this diagram that actually looks like a fairly accurate representation of the tips on my cue (left) and the house cue I used (right):
All of this to say: is it actually reasonable to attribute some of my poor play on the extremely rounded tip (due to it magnifying my stroke errors/tip placement errors)?
But after missing several shots that I'm normally very high percentage on, I checked the cue and realized the tip was extremely rounded. It was basically a perfect dome/half-circle shape. Possibly the most rounded tip I have ever played with.
I didn't want to blame the tip, so I kept shooting with it, and I kept missing far more often than I normally do, and on shots that don't really present much difficulty for me (medium-distance straight-ins and very thick medium-distance cuts). The freshly covered tables at Stroker's were more forgiving than my preferred local table in TN (4.25" pockets with relatively slow, worn cloth), but it wasn't even that I was rattling balls. I was missing by a half-diamond on many shots where distance was remotely a factor.
I only shot for around an hour or so, and I never bothered to switch to a different house cue (partly because I was determined to figure out why I was missing). When I got back to my in-laws' house, I checked to see what Dr. Dave's website says about tip shape and accuracy and found this:
I should mention that my playing shaft is an OB Classic+ with a fairly flat Triangle tip. It's quarter shaped or even flatter, whereas this 13 mm house cue tip was rounder than a dime. Also, I play mostly center ball/vertical axis.One advantage of a flatter tip is that a center-ball hit, with some tip placement inaccuracy, will generally have less unintentional english (and unexpected squirt/swerve/throw). In other words, a larger, flatter tip is more “forgiving” with misalignment errors for near-center-ball hits.
I found this diagram that actually looks like a fairly accurate representation of the tips on my cue (left) and the house cue I used (right):
All of this to say: is it actually reasonable to attribute some of my poor play on the extremely rounded tip (due to it magnifying my stroke errors/tip placement errors)?