Physics in action. And fun.
In theory, not much. It's better to not have any slipping in this demo and the chalk would help with that.And a chalk smudge would cause?...
It will not help you beat Shakey Dave at 8-ball next Friday at the VFW.Can this help me to pocket balls even though I rarely try?
Do I need to go down this rabbit hole? The vid is very cool.
You're the science guy.
I know this is a joke... But ???
But, Is there anything here?
Bob….I usually pay rapt attention to anything you write….but this is no way to set a record..The demo reminds you that your intuition about physical systems can be wrong and you'll give the wrong prediction, but once you see what happens, there is a relatively simple explanation. Physics theory could have told you what was going to happen if you had thought about it a little longer, and worked out all the forces and momentum and stuff.
For me, a similar "seeing it, then understanding it" was cue ball deflection. There was no accurate physical theory of why CB deflection (AKA squirt) happened. Was it taper? Stiffness? Ferrule? Slight miscue? Some cue makers had a pretty good idea that weight up front was involved, but the ideas were not developed to a point that could make good predictions. It was really Bob Meucci's high speed of videos of cues spinning balls that gave the hints needed to develop a useful theory of squirt.
people just adjusted for squirt naturally after playing enough. intermediate players didnt use much english so it came gradually along. nowadays they start english right away as its cool and think you need special equipment to counteract it.The demo reminds you that your intuition about physical systems can be wrong and you'll give the wrong prediction, but once you see what happens, there is a relatively simple explanation. Physics theory could have told you what was going to happen if you had thought about it a little longer, and worked out all the forces and momentum and stuff.
For me, a similar "seeing it, then understanding it" was cue ball deflection. There was no accurate physical theory of why CB deflection (AKA squirt) happened. Was it taper? Stiffness? Ferrule? Slight miscue? Some cue makers had a pretty good idea that weight up front was involved, but the ideas were not developed to a point that could make good predictions. It was really Bob Meucci's high speed of videos of cues spinning balls that gave the hints needed to develop a useful theory of squirt.