Heck of a deal on that "modern" table on cl. I don't think it holds a candle to how the anniversary looks though, for some reason the legs just don't seem as nice as the anni, and there you see the sides with no stripes, looks kind of plain without them.
That anniversary you posted a pic of is nice, but just like those cris crafts people typically do restore them looking as good as possible, even if that means a better finish than they had new. But I bet these tables and those boats shined way more than the anniversary in that pic when they were new, that looks authentically aged. Maybe with an older refinish or maybe it's still the original finish, either way it could look a lot better imho with a bit more pop to the color and finish.
Up to you maybe it is period correct, but you only get one shot at it...
I have looked at this billiard restoration site before and these guys seem to do very correct restorations, and it looks like the finish you show except a little more refined, newer but the same, so you may be right.
Notice the name of the pics say anniversary high polish though, so maybe once again the pics don't do the real thing justice.
The anniversaries I've seen always have the grain on the legs vertical, horizontal grain isn't OEM, someone must have reveneered that one you saw.
Look at all the anni's on the billiard restoration's site link below, there are a couple variations to finish color and these guys seem to know their stuff. I think the darker color is the prettiest, but again that's all personal preference. If anyone could tell you which colors are correct I bet they could if you wanted to ask them. Note that on this link you will see the original brochure from the factory and it shows the darker finish in brunswicks original catalog image, but they may have had options for different finishes or slight differences for different years just like they still do.
http://www.billiardrestoration.com/Antique-Pool-Tables/anniversary.htm
My favorite color and finish from their site are these last pics below, I think the one with a bit of red in the stain is spectacular. Both are obviously slightly darker than the one you showed but more in line with the factory catalog image color shown:
(These pics are starting to make me a little sick that I'm spending all my time refinishing a GC instead of one of those or a centennial... Oh well, maybe I'll get one of them later. I only have the gold crown because it was $150 delivered and desperately needed work, I just need to keep that in mind and remember i'm too broke for the others and stay happy with this one for a while. ) It just would be so much more worth it spending all the time I am on an anniversary with the lower value gold crowns have lately.
Whatever you choose I hope you really take your time and do yours as best you can, those things are still worth $$ when done really nice. Notice how much richer both of these tables look than the factory catalog image? The castings and base don't shine at all in the brochure, it's like the flat factory finish that my gold crown metal had originally, just brushed and completey unpolished and the wood looks cheaper in the catalog image like it could just be plastic laminate from the 70's, but in these restorations they both look way way better than that obviously real wood and super rich. Either of these seriously looks like money to me, the first being more correct to the catalog image, but I absolutely love the 2nd pic with some red in the stain except it seems to be short one stripe.