And even higher than that in EuropePretty sucky if you tell me, But you do get what you pay for. Now you see why Cynergy's and Revo's are $400-500
Can you ask your lathe guy if that is marzipan or nougat in the middle?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You have another one that failed?
cf tube with foam inside. pretty much how all are made. imo Rhino needs to use a much stronger ferrule on the brk. shafts.all the pics i've seen of failure look like ferrule failed leading to damage to the tube itself. a phenolic or tomahawk ferrule would probably stop these issues.I would love to see a photographic comparison between the rhino shaft and a Revo or Cynergy. I own all three of them, and would love to see the inside wall of each of them. I know it might not be possible, but that would be very interesting.
Being low-deflection is not really a consideration with a break cue!Please humor me as I have not taken the CF plunge yet, but weren't CF shafts ferrule-less in the beginning, with just a pad that the tip was glued to? (Maybe some still are?) I thought this was one of the big selling points in making it super low deflection. If you add ferrules, especially heavier (duty) ones, would it not theoretically increase deflection due to increased weight, thus eliminating one of the big selling points of CF?
Apologies if this is common knowledge and a stupid question.
No, they had a thin spacer. Revo called their's the 'vault plate'. The cf shafts with short ferrules are still lo-defl, some are super lo.Please humor me as I have not taken the CF plunge yet, but weren't CF shafts ferrule-less in the beginning, with just a pad that the tip was glued to? (Maybe some still are?) I thought this was one of the big selling points in making it super low deflection. If you add ferrules, especially heavier (duty) ones, would it not theoretically increase deflection due to increased weight, thus eliminating one of the big selling points of CF?
Apologies if this is common knowledge and a stupid question.
I like carbon fiber for my break cue as well because it slides through the bridge much easier in my opinion and is more durable, usually anyways.Being low-deflection is not really a consideration with a break cue!
There's that. Far L is pool shaft and the other two are carom ones.I'll have to take pics later but I have a couple carom shafts and think they take more abuse than a break cue.
Wonder if tip end specs are different than the carom ones?
LOL. Good point. So I guess the benefit is the no warping/no dings?Being low-deflection is not really a consideration with a break cue!
Yes, vault plate. that's what I was thinking of.No, they had a thin spacer. Revo called their's the 'vault plate'. The cf shafts with short ferrules are still lo-defl, some are super lo.