I think its a reflection on the idea of micro-measurement in a game.im not sure what you’re trying to say with this statement.
The general rules of billiards are such that micro-measurement is not necessary since it can not be easily achieved at any given moment. For example, on some shots in a game of 8-ball you may be able to clearly see if your last object ball falls before the 8-ball if they are pocketed on the same shot. That would fulfill the rule requirements of pocketing all the balls of your numerical group before pocketing the 8-ball. However, on some shots they may fall so closely together that without a laser measuring device it would be impossible to tell which actually fell first. To avoid the entire argument the rule was made that the 8-ball can not be pocketed on the same shot as a ball from your numerical group. Rather than figure out a way to be accurate enough the rule made the shot illegal - problem solved.
As far as racks are concerned, I don't know of a specific rule that states where the rack must be placed or how close it needs to be to the intersection of the foot string and the long axis of the table. I do know that whenever possible the rack should be on the spot. If the spot is damaged and making a tight rack is not possible, the rack can be moved back, to either side, and forward of the spot as a last resort.
Moving the rack back just far enough to get a tight rack won't change the dynamics of the break much. Neither will moving the rack just far enough to either side. However, the further you move the rack forward the greater your chances of making a ball on the break. This is really a very small advantage unless the rack is moved much further than it needs to be, but, any advantage will be exploited if someone thinks they can get away with it. As such, it was my understanding that first you move the rack back, then to either side, then forward only if absolutely necessary.