What is the difference?
https://store.kozoom.com/uk/carom_billiards/billiard-accessories/l/aramith.html?p=2
So at the top of the Aramith line they have the following offerings:
1) Super Aramith Pro Cup Prestige: dots on all three balls (107 Euros)
2) Super Aramith Pro Cup ; dot on the white and yellow only (93 Euros)
3) Super Aramith Tournament: no dots on any of the three balls, which are white, yellow, and red. (67 Euro)
4) Super Aramith Deluxe: old school with 2 whites and a red, with a red dot on one of the whites (63 Euro)
5) Super Aramith Traditional: really old school with 2 whites, on with a black dot (what we called the black ball in the old days) and a red. (60 Euro).
So here is my question, Does playability vary between the different set of balls or is it simply cosmetic (not downplaying the value of cosmetics)?
And if there ARE differences in playability are they pronounced enough that a player of modest ability would notice at all?
I have to say, that as someone who cut his billiard teeth in the mid-80s with the really old school type balls, and came back after a 25 year hiatus to find they now had the red.yellow/white, with dots, there is a certain nostalgic appeal to playing with old-school type balls. But only if that didn't involve a noticeable (to me and players of my limited ability) difference in performance.
The fact that they are almost 50% cheaper would be a bonus. But only if they are comparable in performance and durability with the others. I'd like to think that the "Super Aramith" label means that they utilize the same materials, manufacturing process, and quality controls - the Aramith site seems to imply that - but I don't know if that is a correct surmise.