Man, I didn't know that many people were interested in taking pictures of cues like that. Anyway, digital is cool, but I honestly prefer film. If I had the money, I'd get a medium format camera and take the pictures with it. Medium format film is huge compared to 35mm film and digital can't touch it on it's best day...period. Plus, if I wanted to, the now have digital back for medium format cameras, so I could go either way depending on what I wanted to do.
Since I can't afford a medium format camera yet, I'm saving up to get a digital SLR (very, very, reluctantly I might add...), I'll be able to do more because you can change the lens on the camera. Plus 35mm film and digital, from what I've read and been told, is somewhat similar in comparison so I guess I'm leaning towards digital. In some ways you can still be a bit more creative with 35mm film.
If you can get over the initial start up, get a digital slr. Now, believe me, you can take the camera you have and take some awesome pictures with it. The guys at Proficient Billiards use an older Sony that prints directly to a disc, and you see what kind of pictures they create! For me, it's really boiling down to convineince, overall pricing (buying film, printing film, etc...), and ability to be in control. Example, you can manually focus with an slr, you can't with a point and shoot.
Also, I plan to do it from an art aspect as well so that means I'd have the picture printed on a paper designed to capture the fullness of digital photography. I'm no pro or anything, this is just what I want to do is all. For the record, Nikon has a new digital slr coming out called the D50. It's cheaper than the D70 and still has a lot of cool features to start out. It'll basically be competing against Canons digital Rebel.
But to finally answer your question,

check to see if your cameral has a macro setting of some sort. That will allow you to take pictures up close and all of the fine details of your subject. Good luck.
