Re: I beg your pardon ...
Snapshot9 said:
There are more deaths as a result of people drinking than smoking ... fella
Not only does drinking kill the person doing it to excess, but it kills many innocent people as a result of drunken driving....
There is not conclusive proof that second hand smoke is linked to cancer in people, only speculation....
Even my basic menthol pack only has a warning saying, "Smoking by pregnant women may result in fetal injury, premature birth, and low birth weight".
That's why it is a FREE country ....
<snip>
This issue is not about others trying to tell you how to live your life. Personally, I could care less if you want to smoke 5 packs a day and killl yourself. Go for it! Just don't take me with you!
Would you mind providing proof that what you state in your post is not mere heresay? Are you suggesting that pregnant women smoke because it is only a warning?
I would like to encourage you to follow the links provided. You
will not be disappointed.
Here is the link to World Health Organization Reports;
http://www.who.int/inf-pr-1999/en/pr99-35.html
Here is plenty of evidence by many different organisations, including the WHO and others from several countries & continents;
California EPA Report Health Effects of Exposure to Environmental
Tobacco Smoke (1997):
http://www.oehha.org/air/environmental_tobacco/index.html
http://www5.who.int/tobacco/page.cfm?tld=67#healtheffects
http://www.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/synopses/ph23syn.htm
http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/tobacco/contents.htm
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/roc/tenth/profiles/s176toba.pdf
http://www.euro.who.int/document/aiq/8_1ets.pdf
http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/may2000/niehs-15.htm
Here is 464 pages of evidence by the National Cancer
Institute ;
http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/10/m10_complete.pdf
Here is a link to a press release by the WHO stating that Phillip
Morris & other tobacco companies monitored & actively interfered with the conduct of an international ETS epidemiological study by the WHO;
http://www.uicc.org/publ/pr/home/00040701.shtml
and another by the WHO that states that almost HALF the worlds
children are endangered by tobacco smoke;
http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/1999/06/F.RU.990629125134.html
In fact, if you do a google search with these keywords, you will find that there are 26,100 links to sites that offer evidence against what you are saying;
world health organization report environmental tobacco smoke
Here is a link to a Washington Post article about the 1998 ruling
upholding Judge Osteen's EPA ruling;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/tobacco/stories/secondhand072098.htm
Take note of this quote from the article;
Of the reports that were inconclusive or found no health effects,
nearly three-quarters were written by scientists funded by cigarette companies, the JAMA article said. In fact, it said, the evidence "suggests that the tobacco industry may be attempting to influence scientific opinion by flooding the scientific literature with large numbers of review articles supporting its position."
If you would like to stay up to date with the WHO, here is the link for it;
http://www.who.int/tobacco/en/
Here is the current status of ETS is at the WHO;
http://www.who.int/tobacco/health_impact/secondhand_smoke/en/
Take note of this quote from within this WHO page;
While the tobacco industry continues to claim that the evidence that passive smoking causes disease – particularly lung cancer – is controversial, every independent authoritative scientific body that has examined the evidence has concluded that passive smoking causes many diseases ( Table 1 ). Moreover, the evidence that passive smoking causes disease is not new. The first studies linking passive smoking with breathing problems in children and lung cancer in adults 20 years or more ago and the studies linking passive smoking and heart disease are over 10 years old.
The tobacco industry attacks the evidence that passive smoking is
dangerous because it knows that smokers are reluctant to poison
others. Smoke free workplaces, public places, and homes help smokers cut down or stop, which reduces tobacco company sales and profits.