I took this from a post I just made on a different thread:
I'm gonna catch some heat for this but I firmly believe snooker is a far better game for TV, the ebb and flow of it is better than 9,10 ball, or 14.1. The safety battles are better than on a 9' table as well. Also the rule that allows the player to have his opponent put the CB back to where it was laying if his opponent fouls for a second attempt at the same shot people like to watch that(the non players) because they get to watch a second attempt, players know how easy or hard it is so the 2nd chance thing isnt as important. Also the no-rail after a hit makes it simple for nonplayers to understand, I dont know why but people who dont play just dont understand why or what a rail after the hit means(they just dont get it), its vitaly important in 9' table games but not in snooker, just running the CB upto the stack and freezing it is an awesome shot.
What do you think?
I'm gonna catch some heat for this but I firmly believe snooker is a far better game for TV, the ebb and flow of it is better than 9,10 ball, or 14.1. The safety battles are better than on a 9' table as well. Also the rule that allows the player to have his opponent put the CB back to where it was laying if his opponent fouls for a second attempt at the same shot people like to watch that(the non players) because they get to watch a second attempt, players know how easy or hard it is so the 2nd chance thing isnt as important. Also the no-rail after a hit makes it simple for nonplayers to understand, I dont know why but people who dont play just dont understand why or what a rail after the hit means(they just dont get it), its vitaly important in 9' table games but not in snooker, just running the CB upto the stack and freezing it is an awesome shot.
What do you think?