John, how many people or companies do you know went out because of counterfits?
How about this, how many products are we not going to see b/c the inventor decided it will just be stolen from him ?
The first person I know of who went out of business was the inventor of the RF/COAX switcher during the days of VHS and Betamax. I worked for my uncle's video store. We bought for some $50 or so. As soon as Taiwan copied his RF switcher and sold it for half the price, he was out of business.
How about the inventor of the leather wrap fixture ? De Angelo? Seen him lately ?
Should Ernie just sit and not whine about his design being stolen by another maker ?
I've never heard anyone go to jail for selling fake bushkas.
How about him? Did he go out of the wrap fixture business because someone else copied him? Or was it for some other reason?
Tell us about the amount of wrap jigs sold per year and how many sales he lost to copies?
Did he patent his invention? Did he then sue the infringers, assuming that someone did in fact infringe on his patent if he had one? Personally I have not seen any Chinese or Taiwanese company selling wrap jigs so who are these copiers that put DeAngelo out of business?
I didn't say that the originator shouldn't whine about copies. I whine about them all the time. I said that the people on this forum should stop going off about it because they do not understand the actual law surrounding intellectual property, they do not understand innovation built on emulation, they do not understand supply and demand market forces, and they are highly highly selective about how they apply their morality as to which people are condemned as "copiers" and which people get a free pass.
Basically it's like this. I have been a victim of copies more than anyone on this forum. I have suffered the economic rape associated with seeing almost verbatim knockoffs of all my models enter the market. I can complain about it. You can't. Because at the end of the day YOU won't do anything about it. You (the figurative you), won't go to bat for me when people knock off my work, all you will will do is complain if someone you like gets knocked off and be apathetic if someone you don't gets knocked off. So stop pretending to actually care and just let people do what they do.
The fact is that if you make something that works well or something that is desired then someone else will knock it off. In whole or in part. Still people are driven to continue to innovate and create in full knowledge that they will get copied. Big deal, so what. It pisses me off but like I said it's life.
The bottom line is this; If I invent something and I am not strong enough or savvy enough to protect it and outmarket my competition then my competition DESERVES to put me out of business. That's why it's called competition. My job only BEGINS with the invention of something. I have to bring it to market, establish relationships and nurture them, prove why my product is the better choice and continuously improve my products.
The guy with the RF switcher didn't have to be out of business (taking your word on your example). Nothing prevented him from going to Taiwan and having his product made there to be competitive on price. Nothing prevented him from selling his patented design to a much larger company who could better compete and protect the designs. Nothing prevented him from signing partnership deals. Nothing prevented him from negotiating with the company that copied him.
In fact those solutions are far more common than you think. In business everyone is a frenemy. One day you are fighting and the next you are in bed together. Talking about how bad copying is doesn't matter one bit because copying is hardwired into our DNA and you can stand on your soapbox until your beard reaches the ground and rail against it and nothing will change.
The person who gets knocked off has to deal with it as best they can. They aren't a charity. It's their business to deal with it and protect themselves and the consumers. Laurie charges x-amount of dollars to provide a Letter of Authentication (I think she does this). Otherwise she doesn't acknowledge the knockoffs at all. Why not? No need really as her customers, the ones who create the ten year waiting list, know full well where to get authentic SouthWest cues and who to buy from. In other words the MARKET provides the autocorrection to prevent anyone from trying to sell "counterfeit" SouthWests in any serious way.
That's part of the power of the net. While it's easier to present a knockoff to the world it's just as easy to spread the word about the knockoff to the world. Then the consumer gets to decide what sort of person they want to be, a wannabe who buys knockoffs or someone who values the real deal.
And really that's all I want to say about it. This topic is thorny and unfortunately not all who choose to put in their opinion are educated as to the basic law governing intellectual property, nor the economic history or impacts, pro and con governing patents, trademarks and copyrights.
Because of that the discussion is often sidetracked with ignorance and bias.