Table identification

[Mr. Bond]

Is it an illusion in the photo that the leg looks wider at the bottom than the top? Or is the leg the same width all the way down

 

[BigAlTheTiger]

Is it an illusion in the photo that the leg looks wider at the bottom than the top? Or is the leg the same width all the way down

I can measure and find out. Meanwhile, here is a close up shot of the leg that I had taken.

 

[BigAlTheTiger]

Looks like an A.E. Schmidt!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Thanks, I'll take a look at them.

 

[9andout]

It has drop pockets. I will attach a picture of one for you. I have them off the table right now, so please forgive the duct tape. I just have it on them temporary. Thanks for your help. If you need more information, I will try to get it. View attachment 461154

Just a point of information.
Painter's tape works much better for something like that.
No glue residue.

 

[BigAlTheTiger]

Is it an illusion in the photo that the leg looks wider at the bottom than the top? Or is the leg the same width all the way down

You are correct. The leg is wider at the bottom by approximately 1.5 inches. I hope that helps. Let me know if you need more information. Thanks.

 

[BigAlTheTiger]

Looks a bit like a Wendt as well, because the inlay pattern isn't quite the same as the Madison. (Around the same age as the Brunswick would be)

Can you take a pic of the pocket, looking into it?
Wendt pocket irons have a very specific and identifiable shape to them.

Does it have a ball return?
Brunswick ball returns are all patented, so a patent record can, in some cases, can tell you who built it.

Is there anything else that may give a clue as to what table it is since the name plate is missing?