dom_poppa
Banned
I realize you have an ax to grind with me, Matt - and have had for a long time. Obviously that is what motivates you to post, rather than any pretend "outrage" over my perfectly reasonable suggestion.
As for "getting off [my] ass", I have donated many pool cues to worthwhile charities and events, INCLUDING the Glenn effort - so maybe you should consider having a tiny clue about what you're talking about before attacking me over what you are only guessing I may or may not have done.
As for me "telling someone how to spend or donate their hard-earned money", what I offered was simply a suggestion for a public venue. I completely support the Glenn project, and believe it has the best chance of becoming a fully realized museum that will educate the general public and future pool enthusiasts for many generations to come. Unless I am way off base, that does seem to be pretty identical to the entire reason JV (et al) claim to have built these copies of Balabushka's work.
In fact, if anyone is suggesting that they might have some other, more pecuniary-based motive it would seem to be YOU. For myself, I am perfectly willing to take them at their word that they built the collection for the purpose of educating the public about the history of George Balabushka and his work. It they don't feel the Glenn project is a good choice there's always one of the many divisions of the Smithsonian Museum in D.C. In fact, given that a donation to that institution would be tax deductible, it might very well go a long way toward assuaging your great concerns over their (JV's and Mark's) financial interests.
But above all else I am absolutely sure that selling this collection to some collector, only to have him or her bury it away out of the sight of future generations would be the very antithesis of their stated goals. The actual choice of venue is far less important than the undeniable need for such an invaluable historic tribute to be on permanent public display somewhere.
TW
(PS: There's nothing wrong with suggesting to someone how and where they might donate their "hard-earned money". Newspapers, magazines, and television are all inundated (literally) with just such pitches for hundreds of charities, and I seriously doubt you express such fervent outrage against any of them. Just pointing that out in case you thought you were fooling anyone here.)
In other words you believe this project was started to make money and using the "40th anniversary" moniker was just a marketing ploy.
A true commemoration would have been donated for all to see than to flip?