BrianK74 said:
Your assuming that I'm not an "advanced" player.
I never said you weren't... You're getting pretty sensitive ... Relax a bit.
BrianK74 said:
I've been playing pool for 25 years and studying stroke mechanics for the last ten. I've read a dozen books on the subject and viewed a dozen instructional videos and the only place I've heard the "wrist snap" mentioned is on internet message boards. It's urban legend, you are not benefiting from the wrist snap, rather a side effect of the wrsit snap, which can (and should) be achieved by proper stroke mechanics. A proper stroke is the same for all players, short, tall, skinny, fat - as I said earlier, there is only one stroke in any and all billiard games.
I haven't seen it many places either. The wrist-snap was demonstrated to me by an AZ state champion player, who now gives instruction and is very effective. I have learned wrist-snap and use it and now enjoy and understand it's benefits, know when to use it and not, based on my abilities. For you, that means NEVER. So be it. I've benefitted from good training and have been able to develop the extra skill necessary.
If you can't use it, or get no benefit, then don't use it for yourself. That's fine. You've heard other people (besides me) state that they do gain benefit from using it, yet you won't accept it. To each their own.
So, because it's foreign to you, you call it "urban legend"?
What side effect are you referring to regarding the wrist snap?
If you think there's only one stroke, then you really aren't paying much attention.
BrianK74 said:
Yes, you can also misscue by various means too.
Yep... with or without a wrist-snap, along with plenty of other ways as well.
BrianK74 said:
The only way to accurately and repeatably deliver the cue to the cue ball is with a proper stroke. It's simple physics if you are playing with good form. If you are trying to re-invent the wheel - not so simple.
Not only are you ignoring the physic description which described 2 methods of generating the same speed at the point of contact, but you also must've missed the original thread where f8it posted at least 4 different strokes for simply executing a draw shot.
For example, good draw can be executed with no follow through. Not saying that I recommend it as a first option. But there are times and situations where it's necessary (i.e. cue ball within 1 inch of object ball). Show me a good follow through draw on that shot, and you'll be showing me a foul.
I've seen a handicapped player play with basically nothing from the elbow down, except 2 nubs. He has to use both arms, just to pick up the chalk. Surprisingly, pretty good player (of course not a pro player, so don't get technical). Now, you try to tell me he is using the same stroke. He can't possibly execute the stroke you're referring to. He uses a totally different method for breaking the balls - gets a good spread too.
But, in your world, he must be using the same stroke....
I've also seen a muscle bound guy, about 5'4" and 230 pounds shoot pool. Doubt at all that he could execute with any form of consistency the stroke that you mention. So, he compensates for it his own way, and as a result is a very good player (once again, not pro). Surprisingly, he has no backstroke at all, yet is an excellent shot maker and pretty good position play. I could describe it all you want, and you'd never believe he could have any game. Yet if you saw him in person, you'd see what he can do.
You look at the pro men and they have quite different strokes. Do you really believe that Allison Fisher, Efrem Reyes, Francisco Bustamante, Danny Basovich, Alex Pagulayan, Corey Duel, McCready, .... all have the same stroke and use that one stroke on every shot?