THE BOTTOM LINE - Is the IPT DEAD ? Yay or Nay ?

jimmyg said:
How about temporarily on life support with KT at the controls?

With all respect due those who are hard at work fighting, at their own expense, to try and bring some justice and unity to the players. Unfortunalely, my honest feelings are that it has been mostly done in vain.

The history of pool and the nature of it's professional players make attempts at their unity of will and purpose almost impossible.

I believe that KT is a disease in the body of pool and has to be surgically removed in order for pool to have any chance for respectability. I also believe that he has singlehandily set back any possibility of that happening for a least another decade.

KT was on the ropes, he could have been terminated and pool freed from his parasitic influence had the players the strength and will to make the very difficult choices necessary to accomplish this end. That would have meant having the strenght to file suit against him. He would have been forced into either paying them in full, or having to file for bankruptsy and defending himself criminally and civilly. I believe that had the players taken a hardball stand either 1) they would have forced a much better financial deal for themselves, or, 2) they would have beaten him in court and, ultimately had won even more in court.

The catch was that they would have had to refuse any payments that KT offered and totally refused to play on any future tournaments that he claimed were to be held. Severing ties with KT is the key.

Instead, the players have showed KT that they are willing, not only to accept 11% payments and promises, but also a willingness to support and participate on any future tour this snake decides to hold. Basically they immediately dropped their pants for 11%. And don't think KT doesn't thank them for it.

Look, I understand that I, am not in the player's shoes and that makes it very easy for me to take this verbal position, but that still does not invalidate it either.

So, is the IPT dead? It is whatever KT decides it is. KT has all the options, he will gauge the income from qualifiers, possible sales, will restructure player and vendor debt, and decide whether or not to hold future tournaments. They players will be there if he calls, and he knows it.

In my opinion, this is the unfortunate reality.

Jim

Hardly have truer words been spoken on thisforum regarding the ipt.

The current situation is EXACTLY as jimmyg states it.

Out of the 150 current ipt players, i will guestimate that 50% just want thier money and want nothing more to do with the ipt. I have also found that there is no correlation to the players abilities. This sentiment can be found covering the entire spectrum of all pro's.

What surprised me is that there is a contingency of US players, mainly, that feel that the ipt is a once in a lifetime chance. At this point, they are not optomistic, feel that they probably wont be paid in full, but that they shouldn't be "forcing" kt into bankruptcy, because doing that extinguishes ANY hope.

I was dissapointed to hear this, because ultimately, without a larger percentage of players on board, it doesnt seem fair to act "against" these players wishes.

As an example.

It only takes 3 or 4 players to file suit. Can we do that TODAY, yes. Somewhere down the line, as more aggrieved players step forward, or file thier own suits individually, the court would be asked to transform the suit into class action status, folding all current litigation and aggrieved parites into one all encompassing suit.

If this was done today, everything stops. As long as there are players, that are well respected amongst their peers, and billiard community as a whole, that want to extend EVERY opportunity to the ipt, we will honor their wishes, even ove the wishes of those that would like to see action taken now.

Pool players have a sad and long history of not being able to carry the same flag. In the end blackjack dave sapolis was COMPLETELY right.

The ball is in the ipt's court right now. Hopefully they will honor their promises. They will atleast get the opportunity to do so.

rg
 
NYC cue dude said:
Hardly have truer words been spoken on thisforum regarding the ipt.

The current situation is EXACTLY as jimmyg states it.

Out of the 150 current ipt players, i will guestimate that 50% just want thier money and want nothing more to do with the ipt. I have also found that there is no correlation to the players abilities. This sentiment can be found covering the entire spectrum of all pro's.

What surprised me is that there is a contingency of US players, mainly, that feel that the ipt is a once in a lifetime chance. At this point, they are not optomistic, feel that they probably wont be paid in full, but that they shouldn't be "forcing" kt into bankruptcy, because doing that extinguishes ANY hope.

I was dissapointed to hear this, because ultimately, without a larger percentage of players on board, it doesnt seem fair to act "against" these players wishes.

As an example.

It only takes 3 or 4 players to file suit. Can we do that TODAY, yes. Somewhere down the line, as more aggrieved players step forward, or file thier own suits individually, the court would be asked to transform the suit into class action status, folding all current litigation and aggrieved parites into one all encompassing suit.

If this was done today, everything stops. As long as there are players, that are well respected amongst their peers, and billiard community as a whole, that want to extend EVERY opportunity to the ipt, we will honor their wishes, even ove the wishes of those that would like to see action taken now.

Pool players have a sad and long history of not being able to carry the same flag. In the end blackjack dave sapolis was COMPLETELY right.

The ball is in the ipt's court right now. Hopefully they will honor their promises. They will atleast get the opportunity to do so.

rg

Randy,
This is not suprising to hear but maybe all the players would unite behind asking KT to put his OWN promises into a legally binding contract? This is the kind of thing Dave said they needed from the start and was correct. I don't know what situtation the players union reached but hopefully this is at least possible? From there it would be a relatively simple step to approach KT as one and demand he put his promises into a legally binding contract. For too long the communication between the IPT and the players has been 1 way traffic.
 
Um, the human race has a long history of not being able to carry the same flag. In some cases this has resulted in a measure of freedom for some groups and oppression for other. Pool players are just a microcosm of society at large.

It is also presumptious to think that everything stops because a lawsuit is filed. If that were the case then Trudeau would have been history long before he started the IPT. He is the "most sued person in history" right. Obviously the lawsuits filed against him haven't stopped him at all only forced him to come up with different avenues.

Any of the players who wish to file suit for their money are free to do so. As for players not being able to rally under the same flag, well, until now they have not had a flag strong enough to rally under.

As I see it, the need to form a player's union and the desire to file a lawsuit are related but separate issues. The players need a union so that they can collectively negotiate with the likes of Trudeau. Then they can collectively decide to file a lawsuit on the player's behalf should negotiation fail.

Forming a player's union should not be divisive nor should it be a problem if some high profile players decline to join. The players union should represent the block of players who want to have strength in numbers. Without a broad base, there will be no tournaments for the high-profile players to win nature would take it's course and those that holdout would eventually see the wisdom in being part of a larger group that works to benefit all. Not everyone who works in a union factory is a union member. Membership in the union is voluntary. Some benefits that are negotiated by the union are enjoyed by non-union members. To have all the protections afforded by colelctive bargaining however it is necessary to support the union.

The ball is in the player's court. The IPT has fumbled it by reneging on their promise of guaranteed payouts. They have handed the power to the players who are now creditors to the IPT. Unless the IPT players have waived their right to sue for grievances they now hold the future of the IPT in their hands. Whether they miscue or run out remais to be seen.
 
Roadie said:
"Right Mind" is subjective as we know. Some might say, perhaps some with far more resources than Trudeau, that no one in their "right mind" would throw away millions of dollars gambling on a pool tour. The question was asked if the IPT is "dead". The answer is that it is not yet dead either figuratively or literally.

If Trudeau held a tournament today then a lot of players would show up. Fans would be attending, people would pay money to sign up and watch it on the internet. Why? Because the game is what the attraction is for those folks, not the personality of the promoter. Do people and participants not show up at boxing matches because Don King is involved? No one ever really questions how the prize money in a boxing match is truly structured, what the payout terms are, who gets what cut and so on..... at least it isn't front page news if they do.

Arenas are filled, pay-per-view subscriptions are sold based on one thing, the people want to be entertained. If the IPT can provide that then they will come out of the self-induced coma they are in. If not then they will surely die in the most literal sense.


Don King probably pays his bills too....;)
________
 
Last edited:
I was at the derby classic and the IPT event being hosted their just reminded me of

when someone opens a deli and then next week theres a new deli across the street and they sell everything the other guy doesn't, or its cheaper, or some gimmick.

It sounds like a tour that would be successful is designed by both players and promoters. What those designs include maybe a little less flair and more shine.
 
Last edited:
Not dead, but mortally wounded. We may in fact be seeing a persistent vegetative state now -- nothing but DVD sales and streaming video subscriptions.
 
NYC cue dude said:
Hardly have truer words been spoken on thisforum regarding the ipt.

The current situation is EXACTLY as jimmyg states it.

Out of the 150 current ipt players, i will guestimate that 50% just want thier money and want nothing more to do with the ipt. I have also found that there is no correlation to the players abilities. This sentiment can be found covering the entire spectrum of all pro's.

What surprised me is that there is a contingency of US players, mainly, that feel that the ipt is a once in a lifetime chance. At this point, they are not optomistic, feel that they probably wont be paid in full, but that they shouldn't be "forcing" kt into bankruptcy, because doing that extinguishes ANY hope.

I was dissapointed to hear this, because ultimately, without a larger percentage of players on board, it doesnt seem fair to act "against" these players wishes.

As an example.

It only takes 3 or 4 players to file suit. Can we do that TODAY, yes. Somewhere down the line, as more aggrieved players step forward, or file thier own suits individually, the court would be asked to transform the suit into class action status, folding all current litigation and aggrieved parites into one all encompassing suit.

If this was done today, everything stops. As long as there are players, that are well respected amongst their peers, and billiard community as a whole, that want to extend EVERY opportunity to the ipt, we will honor their wishes, even ove the wishes of those that would like to see action taken now.

Pool players have a sad and long history of not being able to carry the same flag. In the end blackjack dave sapolis was COMPLETELY right.

The ball is in the ipt's court right now. Hopefully they will honor their promises. They will atleast get the opportunity to do so.

rg

Thanks, Randy. I was a little concerned that my opinion would not be taken in the same pro player spirit that it was intended, and I greatly appreciate your agreement.

I firmly believe every word that I wrote, especially that "KT is a disease in the body of pool and has to be surgically removed in order for pool to have any chance for respectability". Although many players agree and feel that the lawsuit is absolutely necessary, as long as there are several players that choose to hold onto this impossible dream rather than go forward with the lawsuit, as you properly stated, you are, unfortunalely, left with little choice and not move forward.

I've always agreed with David's (Blackjack's) position as well.

Jim
 
"Don King probably pays his bills" - but we don't know or care because we don't follow the politics of boxing fanatically, we just consume it. That's my only point. Vilify Trudeau all you want to but remember that the larger world could care less about him or what he does as long as he serves them what they want. People don't purchase things on moral grounds, they purchase them for selfish, instant gratification reasons.

Perhaps products shoudl carry disclaimers like cigarettes. "This teleivision show is being sponsored by the sales of products which have been found to be harmful to consumers". That opens up another can of worms.

The point being that no matter how much you personally hate Trudeau he still has every opportunity to sell the "IPT" to media outlets and online subscribers without much in the way of true opposition. Therefore, the IPT lives. If Big Media thinks it can make money by broadcasting IPT shows then it will depsite that the players haven't been paid or there is a subforum of a few outspoken and virulent opponents of Trudeau and his actions. The ultimate irony would be if ESPN bought some shows and filled up the hour with drug ads.
 
The IPT Is NOT Dead, It's Only RESTING

It's as clear as the nose on your face, that the IPT is falling apart.

Doug
( It's DEAD, it's feet are nailed to the perch. "It's not dead, it's only RESTING" )

Nick B. takes the IPT out of the cage and thumps its head on the counter ("Hellooo, Polly!"), then tosses it up in the air and watches it plummet to the floor without reacting in any way. Jake remains unconvinced, claiming that it is now stunned, and that it is "pining for the fjords."

Nick B. points out that the only reason that the IPT had been sitting on its perch in the first place was that it had been nailed there. Jake counters that it was simply to stop it from 'postponing' tournaments. Nick B. disagrees in these words:

Nick B.: It's not pinin', it's passed on! This IPT is no more! It has ceased to be! It's expired and gone to meet its maker! This is a late IPT. It's a stiff. Bereft of life, it rests in peace, if you hadn't nailed it to the perch it would be pushing up the daisies! It's rung down the curtain and joined the choir invisible! This is an ex-IPT !
Jake admits defeat, claims that he is right out of IPTs, and offers a 10-ball ring game as replacement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Blue_parrot

Doug
( an oldie but a goodie )
 
Back
Top