BiG_JoN said:That's my closed bridge as well.
I started using it a few years ago after i saw a guy using it on draw shots.
I gave it a shot and it worked for me.
I've used it ever since.
It's comfy for me.
I also think it has another plus (at least for me,) that i don't have to have that bridge as tight as a normal loop bridge, so if my shaft isn't super smooth it won't bother me as much.[/QUOTE
I've tried this bridge and it has the exact opposite effect for me. I guess my fingers are just too small. I can barely move the cue through the loop with this bridge. Also, Big Jon I'm diggin on the that avatar.
karambolista said:Is there any advantage?
Why do alot of pros use this type of bridge?
Since when did people started using it, I saw some matches by Mosconi and his contempories and they were only using the regular close bridge.
karambolista said:Since when did people started using it.
Rickw said:I've got pretty big hands and I've been bridging like that from day 1. Didn't know it was a "crossover" bridge, just thought that was a closed bridge.
karambolista said:On the pool books that I've read the normal closed bridge is the same with the pictures above.
I called it the cross-over closed bridge because the index finger is crossing over the middle finger.
Fred Agnir said:Well,... neither of these two are what Buddy Hall or Nick Varner use as their "normal closed bridge." They bridge by touching the tips of their thumb and index finger together creating a V with their thumb and middle finger, leaving a good amount of space between the index finger and the cue.
I don't know if there's any "advantage" so to speak, but the "cross over" and specifically the Buddy Hall/Nick Varner bridge forms a base for the cue with the middle finger (the bottom finger) as opposed to relying on the index finger to loop over and under (to the side?) to form part of the base for the cue.
Fred