IMO, tight pockets are much more significant in separating players by ability than slow, unresponsive cloth is.
The nap cloth limits a player's aresenal of shots. They cannot use all of their "tricks" nearly as effectively (certain extreme english position shots, masse shots, throw shots...). The better player knows more of these techniques and uses them more adeptly, so where is the advantage lost?
On tight equipment, the better player will win more often regardless of the playing surface. So why take some of their options away? That's where much of the magic lies that we fans enjoy so much. There's a reason Simonis has been used almost exclusively over the past decade or two in pro tournaments: because the players prefer it and it plays better.
I've heard the rationale that inconsistencies in the nap cloth liken it to a golf course, making the players adapt their games. Imagine spreading pebbles on a bowling lane. I don't think the games can compare directly in that sense. The playing surfaces are immensely different in size and consistency (plus one is organic and thus more difficult to tailor). I think KT is taking this PGA model a little to far.
Bottom line though - KT is putting up the dough and my opinion means s**t. He makes the calls. I'll still argue that I'm right though, haha.
The nap cloth limits a player's aresenal of shots. They cannot use all of their "tricks" nearly as effectively (certain extreme english position shots, masse shots, throw shots...). The better player knows more of these techniques and uses them more adeptly, so where is the advantage lost?
On tight equipment, the better player will win more often regardless of the playing surface. So why take some of their options away? That's where much of the magic lies that we fans enjoy so much. There's a reason Simonis has been used almost exclusively over the past decade or two in pro tournaments: because the players prefer it and it plays better.
I've heard the rationale that inconsistencies in the nap cloth liken it to a golf course, making the players adapt their games. Imagine spreading pebbles on a bowling lane. I don't think the games can compare directly in that sense. The playing surfaces are immensely different in size and consistency (plus one is organic and thus more difficult to tailor). I think KT is taking this PGA model a little to far.
Bottom line though - KT is putting up the dough and my opinion means s**t. He makes the calls. I'll still argue that I'm right though, haha.