The two "PROFESSORS"

Do you like the idea of having a "Ring Game" attached to pool tournaments?

  • Yes

    Votes: 15 93.8%
  • No

    Votes: 1 6.3%

  • Total voters
    16

hemicudas

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
First you have the "Professor" of One Pocket, Grady Mathews. Grady has come up with some innovative ideas in the past. His "Grady" rules for One Pocket being just one but of all the ideas Grady has had, none will ever be exceeded by the $30,000 Ring Game Tournament idea he has planned for the 2004 Derby City Classic. This idea will turn out to be the future of tournaments everywhere.

Next you have R.H. "Professor" Gilmer. Professor Gilmer is a "real" professor, teaching finance at Mississippi State University. "Professor" Gilmer also owns Southern Billiards in Starkville, MS. Professor Gilmer recognized the popularity of the Ring Game in the past and how much pool fans enjoyed them. Expanding on "Professor" Mathews' idea, Professor Gilmer wrote a computer program for just that purpose and after extensive testing put the program to the ultimate test at his own "Fall Follies" tournament at Southern Billiards Sat. night Oct. 25th.

The inaugural, biannual, Southern Billiards 10 ball Ring Game went off flawlessly. The computer program worked to a tee. Keeping track of the players wins, losses, money standing, order of play, (order was changed every 10 games) and raises of the wager every 20 games.

I have attended and occasionally played in pool tournaments for 35 years and never have I seen more electricity in the air than there was at Southern Billiards Sat. night. The Professor had 2 TV sets strategically placed in the room to keep players and fans updated on the progress of each of the 7 players. All one had to do was to look up and see how much money a player had left, how soon the wager would be raised and to what value the next raise would be. One could easily tell if a player had to win that particular game or be eliminated.

Far the favorite to win the Ring Game was Danny "Kid Delicious" Basavich and after losing 25 games in a row from the start said, " I lose 25 in a row and still had a ball". Showing the class of "Kid Delicious". Danny knew the pitfalls of playing in a ring game, all the bad rolls you can get, no matter how good you play.

I believe this "Ring Game" idea will start a trend in the pool world. It was successful beyond anyone's imagination. My hat is off to both "Professors" for this inovative idea......$Bill

By the way, if you haven't heard, Jamie "Red Riffle" Farrell won the $7,000 first place money and the Professor paid out every dime of the money in the Ring Game.
 
Last edited:
It's been about 5 years since I've watched or played in a ring game. Can someone explain exactly how a ring game works? I know a little, but not enough to get myself in a game.

Zim
 
The ring game concept is a good one, and it does generate a lot of excitement for the spectators.

I am looking forward to the Derby City Classic to see Grady's ring game. I hope Accu-Stats films it. I think it would be a best seller.

ManlyShot
 
How are ya Zim? A "Ring Game" is simply a 9 ball, or in this case, 10 ball game, with 3 or more players in it playing for a fixed amount, or in this case, progressive, meaning the bet is raised every 20 games. When you run out of money you are out of the game. The last man in the "Ring Game" is the winner.
 
Hemicudas,

Who won the 9-ball tournament held in conjunction with the ring game?


p.s. the ring game as a feature at tournaments is an outstanding idea, and really motivates up and coming players to elevate their game so they will be one of the invitees.
 
Last edited:
So you're saying that 3 players anti up say $50 each per game, one guy wins the game and gets $150. After say 20 games they raise the game to $75 per player, and the winner of the game gets $225. And you say once a player is BUST he's out? So each player starts with the same amount, say $2000. Is this correct?
 
the ring game

the only problem i had with the ring game is the fact that we werent allowed to play while it was going on dont get me wrong it was alot of fun to watch. but i had several poeple that wanted to match up with me and we couldnt because of the ring game. but other than that i think its a great addition to the tournament.
 
Zims Rack said:
So you're saying that 3 players anti up say $50 each per game, one guy wins the game and gets $150. After say 20 games they raise the game to $75 per player, and the winner of the game gets $225. And you say once a player is BUST he's out? So each player starts with the same amount, say $2000. Is this correct?

Exactly right Zim. 7 players posted $1,500 each with the Professor. No money changed hands. The computer program the Professor wrote took care of the rest. The results of each game was posted on the closed circuit TVs and when your $1,500 was gone you were out. The bet started at $50 per game and ended at $1,000 per game. Had they gone to 120 games an All In provision would have been enacted but Jamie eliminated Hennessee with the bet still at $1,000.
 
I could see a trend started here. What a great concept and a very exciting time for true pool enthusiasts. I am very envious that I could not have been there. Too bad Eric Durbin did not get to make it too. I hear he was on the invitee list. He is from my home Pool Hall and he was nowhere to be found this past weekend. Wish the winners all of the best.
Peace,
 
Hemi,

Did they play no intentional safeties, next player can elect to shoot or make previous player shoot if no contact with the ob and if the cb scratches, ob is spotted and cb is shot from the kitchen?
 
Rickw said:
Hemi,

Did they play no intentional safeties, next player can elect to shoot or make previous player shoot if no contact with the ob and if the cb scratches, ob is spotted and cb is shot from the kitchen?

Rick, they played roll-out. The following player can shoot or pass the shot back. If he passes the shot back and a second foul occurs, he has ball in hand behind the line. He can still pass the shot back to the previous shooter. If a third foul occurs, he has ball in hand anywhere on the table. The latter never happened. All balls pocketed on a foul are spotted.

By the way Cactus Ed, Danny Basavich did win the tournament and the $1,000 first prize. Maybe that will ease the pain of losing 25 games in a row in the Ring Game. My congratulations to you Danny.
 
Last edited:
Well good god! It appears that I am all alone in voting 'no'. Am I sped?

I vote no because of the fatigue factor. These double elimination tourneys w/ 50+ players take all durn day, if not weekend. To be a factor in the ring game, you can't be draggin' ass.

Obviously alone,
-pign
 
piglit said:
Well good god! It appears that I am all alone in voting 'no'. Am I sped?

I vote no because of the fatigue factor. These double elimination tourneys w/ 50+ players take all durn day, if not weekend. To be a factor in the ring game, you can't be draggin' ass.

Piglet, if you ever get a chance to go to the Derby City Classic, you had better prepare yourself for the fatigue factor. Action all week long, day and night, non-stop. If you snooze, you lose.

Looking forward to Grady's ring game at Derby City Classic.

ManlyShot
 
Back
Top