Five years ago, Deno wrote:
> A good cue tip (Moori, Chandivert, etc.) will conform and become
> the optimum shape for your style of play. Reshaping the tip only
> makes you work harder as a player. If you play with a lot of
> english, your tip will shape itself very round, almost like the
> shape of the ball. If you happen to be a center-ball player, the
> tip will be flatter. If you shape the tip to something other
> than what it shapes itself to, you are working against yourself.
When I first read this, it all made perfectly sense to me. But then, when thinking about it, I've come to the opposite conclusion. For example, if someone who mostly hits center-ball gets the cueball in a position where a lot of english is needed -- then suddenly he would be handicapped by the flat shape of his tip.
Hence, I'm a tip-shaper proponent. Anyone else..?
-- peer
> A good cue tip (Moori, Chandivert, etc.) will conform and become
> the optimum shape for your style of play. Reshaping the tip only
> makes you work harder as a player. If you play with a lot of
> english, your tip will shape itself very round, almost like the
> shape of the ball. If you happen to be a center-ball player, the
> tip will be flatter. If you shape the tip to something other
> than what it shapes itself to, you are working against yourself.
When I first read this, it all made perfectly sense to me. But then, when thinking about it, I've come to the opposite conclusion. For example, if someone who mostly hits center-ball gets the cueball in a position where a lot of english is needed -- then suddenly he would be handicapped by the flat shape of his tip.
Hence, I'm a tip-shaper proponent. Anyone else..?
-- peer