I've heard talk of tailor's chalk!Nice system. No numbers, and no measuring a mirror out in space. I think the hard part about parallel shift systems like this is shifting from the 2-3 line to the shot line. That takes some practice.
I've heard talk of tailor's chalk!Nice system. No numbers, and no measuring a mirror out in space. I think the hard part about parallel shift systems like this is shifting from the 2-3 line to the shot line. That takes some practice.
It was a picture!Not reading any of it
I've seen that, too. My Diamond measurements flatten out even more at the very shallow end, as much as 50%, but it's not that far off.(According to a system by Bud Harris, a rolling cue ball that has a shallow angle into the rail (nearly parallel to the rail) comes off the rail at 70% of the incoming angle. For shallow angles the running/reverse on the cue ball has almost no effect on the outbound angle.)
Perhaps we mean different things by the mirror system, but the way I do it requires no visual judgement/guesswork/intuition, just simple steps to measure and memorize a point on the rail.
I'll clarify how I do it, perhaps there's some key difference that might help you:
View attachment 770508
1. Stand behind the target point (black cross next to the one-ball in the image), and place your cue on the table such that the tip touches the target point. Make sure your cue is angled in a straight line towards the rail, and then put your fingers on the cue on the rail-hit point (black cross next to the rail in the image) to form the red line in the image.
2. Keeping the fingers on the cue, move the cue backwards such that your tip now touches the rail-hit point (Forming the orange line in the image). This effectively doubles the distance, and your fingers touching the cue are now placed exactly at the mirror aiming point (Red cross in the image).
3. Keep your mirror aiming point carefully by not moving your fingers, and then move the cue such that it points from your fingers to the cue ball (blue line in the image).
4. Keeping your cue on this line, locate the point your cue overlaps the rail on the diamond-line. To memorize this point, I personally subdivide the diamond markings in my head (for example into 1/10ths) and then memorize it as a decimal number, e.g. in this image it would be 7/10 between the diamonds (0 being the left diamond, 1 being the right diamond). To not forget which diamonds we are talking about, I would memorize the point in this case by memorizing "1.3 from the end rail", meaning 1 full diamond then 0.3 diamonds.
I agree that if you gain value past just locating the mirror point, various systems can indeed be useful in some scenarios.
I use this by feel, but is nice to see measurements here. I didn’t know exactly what they were until now.I've seen that, too. My Diamond measurements flatten out even more at the very shallow end, as much as 50%, but it's not that far off.
View attachment 770738
great system.....@boogieman you posted this in the wrong forum.
Post in thread 'Funny pic/gif thread...'
https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/funny-pic-gif-thread.93024/post-7896312
@boogieman you posted this in the wrong forum.
Post in thread 'Funny pic/gif thread...'
https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/funny-pic-gif-thread.93024/post-7896312
Huh?@boogieman you posted this in the wrong forum.
Post in thread 'Funny pic/gif thread...'
https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/funny-pic-gif-thread.93024/post-7896312
That's not funny though.Huh?
I've got 2 beginners, one intermediate player, one advanced player, and me hitting pretty much every kick on the table with it. The intermediate, advanced and me are a favorite to make a kick. I guess I don't see what's wrong with it. Again I re-used someone's diagram and added my own lines to an already made drawing, not to scale. I said it's a visualization, not a math based approach. IDK there's a system that works good there if you care to understand it.great system.....![]()