pittpanther
New member
Hello everyone... I finally have gotten a chance to go and check out some used tables. Just a little background - my wife and I would be considered beginners, and are not sure how "serious" we will be with regard to learning and playing.
With that said, over the last year or so, I have researched many of the brands, and was initially settled on a Diamond Pro - although my wife was looking for a more furniture oriented table.
After checking out some of the prices on used tables, I was really drawn to the value they offer. Since used Diamond tables are generally few and far between, my choices narrowed to Vitalie and Brunswick. The wife loves the Vitalie's for their appearance, as do I actually. We have space in our basement for any size, but a 7' would fit the best (i.e.: no need to move existing furniture, etc.)
I went to look at two (2) tables yesterday, both of which I really like on their own merits. The 1st is a 7' Brunswick Brookstone with Queen Anne legs:
It is an near perfect shape and includes a set of Centennials, along with a pool table light, floor stand cue holder and two (2) chairs. The seller and I decided on a price of $1,000 for it. It is only a couple of years old, and saw limited action by adults only.
The next is a 9' Peter Vitalie Chippendale. Amazing looking table - great shape (not quite as good as the Brunswick). It really was stunning. It comes with a pool table light, a cue rack and a set of balls. The guy is asking $6500 for it - but it seems high...! Anyway, here it is: What would a reasonable offer for it be?
Ok - I know that these two tables are very different in a number of ways - mostly size and price. I think we would be very happy with the Brunswick, but may regret passing on the Vitalie (which according to the seller lists at close to $20K new...?) If my wife and I do get serious with playing and start looking at league play - which would be better for us? Which is the better value/deal?
Any/all comments would be appreciated. Thanks!
Doug
With that said, over the last year or so, I have researched many of the brands, and was initially settled on a Diamond Pro - although my wife was looking for a more furniture oriented table.
After checking out some of the prices on used tables, I was really drawn to the value they offer. Since used Diamond tables are generally few and far between, my choices narrowed to Vitalie and Brunswick. The wife loves the Vitalie's for their appearance, as do I actually. We have space in our basement for any size, but a 7' would fit the best (i.e.: no need to move existing furniture, etc.)
I went to look at two (2) tables yesterday, both of which I really like on their own merits. The 1st is a 7' Brunswick Brookstone with Queen Anne legs:
It is an near perfect shape and includes a set of Centennials, along with a pool table light, floor stand cue holder and two (2) chairs. The seller and I decided on a price of $1,000 for it. It is only a couple of years old, and saw limited action by adults only.
The next is a 9' Peter Vitalie Chippendale. Amazing looking table - great shape (not quite as good as the Brunswick). It really was stunning. It comes with a pool table light, a cue rack and a set of balls. The guy is asking $6500 for it - but it seems high...! Anyway, here it is: What would a reasonable offer for it be?
Ok - I know that these two tables are very different in a number of ways - mostly size and price. I think we would be very happy with the Brunswick, but may regret passing on the Vitalie (which according to the seller lists at close to $20K new...?) If my wife and I do get serious with playing and start looking at league play - which would be better for us? Which is the better value/deal?
Any/all comments would be appreciated. Thanks!
Doug