onepocketchump said:
There is NO POSSIBLE WAY for the IPT to destroy all current associations or even dent them signifigantly, at least in the current state of the IPT.
The IPT has a field of 150 players and six tournaments. They got several thousand applications. The players that did not make it are not going to stop playing.
League players aren't going to quit leagues. German players aren't going to quit their associations. The San Miguel tour is going to keep going.
In other words, the hundreds of thousands of people who play pool in an organized fashion will continue to do so and natural progression will insure that there are always venues for the better players to compete on the world stage.
I'll agree with you John. Win or lose for the IPT, it will be no worse for billiards. Some organizations may suffer, but it won't kill the industry.
It think that IF the IPT makes it's two year commitment and then decides to bail out, and there is no guarantee the IPT will stick for 2 years, then the state of the billiards industry and its economics will have been changed. Obviously a good thing. And, public awareness and participation will hopefully grow.
But THEN, if the IPT bails out, someone else WILL examine the opportunity in a different light than they would today. IF there's a way to monetize it, its probably through increased advertising revenues. But remember, there has to be a money stream for the system. Advertisers want profits you know, and so do the pro sports leagues and their team owners.
Is there a big enough market? IPT is attempting to make the market bigger. But if they should bail out for whatever reason, the mistakes and successes will be evaluated, and with additional fine-tuning a new proposition will come along. (Possibly even sooner than 2 years in competion to the IPT. I suspect some organizations are already looking for money in different ways than they have in the past.)
Frankly, after watching the billiards industry for the past 15 years, you cannot convince me that this is a bad situation, other than some distaste for KT's current sales techniques and products and possible snake-oil remedies. Still, he is apparantly very capable, he has a vision, it seems to be just the right amount of 'fringe' that is needed here. After all, mainstream advertising didn't get it done. If he can keep the image relatively tasteful, and increase the audience, then the money will follow.
My questions are how much of a stigma there will be to overcome, and can the IPT keep it going for a number of years.