crawfish said:I just feel with the right promotion (money) coming from a reputable company, where everyone knows they will get paid, the men would take the "tour" more seriously. There would be stipulations on playing in unsanctioned events, also. This would promote wanting to be labeled a "pro." The money would have to be there, though. Let's say a field of only 120 designated pros, based on performance. Just like golf. They'd have to make the cut for an event. Double elimination cutting the field to 64? At the end of the year, the following year's field would be chosen (120). There would have to be an "end of the year" payout, thus promoting playing in all of the events, kind of like in NASCAR. This would take a lot of moolah and organization. But, it would work. All of this would make the "tour" a serious "pro" tour. These mini self invited events would cease, if the big sponsor stipulated to play in only aka "Nextel" events. But the money would have to be there. People would work to be in the 120 designated pros. It could finally be respected. To enter the field of 120, how about a qualifying event at the end of each year for the bottom 30% finishers, allowing new competitors, any and all to compete (with a pretty hefty entry fee) to keep the field serious.
The structure you have brilliantly laid out is almost the exact same structure as the Hilton Tour. Unfortunately, it wasn't advertised ahead of time I think, as well as lack of participation by spectators and pool players. The Hilton Hotels was going to invest a lot of bucks into pool until they realized there was not enough interest to attract spectators and players to the events.
I think the money would come, to include Nextel and others, if something would happen to put pool on the map. That "something" is what I am grappling with.
JAM