What Type of Cueist Are You & Why Do You Think Your Way is Best?

Who are you, At Large version 2.0?

You know the best part of that thread is Jay "quoting" Neil when he predicted the future.

If AtLarge and I worked in the same firm....he would be the CEO...
....and I would be the janitor.

Yeah, I like Jay's post also....and I have always liked you posting here too.....
...you ain't afraid to put your dukes up.
 
"Abundant english is redundant english."

strongest prophetic phrase ever.....the truth is always funnier than fiction lol
 
You know Rick, you keep bringing up me erasing a lot of posts like it has some merit or something to some non-point you are trying to make. Funny part is, you have thousands of post that are just dots or arrows. Posts that never have said anything. At least the ones I erased had good content at one time. :rolleyes:

Then exactly why did you make the extreme effort & spend a very significant amount of time to personally go back & erase each one individually?

I know what I was told by another one, but I do not actually know if it is true, but it certainly seems like you.
 
By this point, he's probably done that more than the number of posts you erased. :D

Not even anywhere close, Bruce.

And many times I am not erasing anything.

I think it is odd that you know about what Neil did & do not see an issue there.
 
Not even anywhere close, Bruce.

And many times I am not erasing anything.

I think it is odd that you know about what Neil did & do not see an issue there.

probably just didn't want the nit king to have it......i'm not worried about that thought because i doubt if you could learn any of it if you were in the matrix and got the direct download rick.....you still have yet to come up with any thing to prove yourself right or me and others wrong with anything more than your opinions.....not even a study or a video....just you flapping your fingers like some do their gums....

how did you say that? the hands dont matter tight or loose in regard to each stroke.....something to the order of, you do it consciously lol its not your hand......

i've posted videos, got a few processing also as we speak......and nothing from 5 speed shakesspear yet but fulff and fodder........

just throw more poop,
-Greyghost
 
Then exactly why did you make the extreme effort & spend a very significant amount of time to personally go back & erase each one individually?

I know what I was told by another one, but I do not actually know if it is true, but it certainly seems like you.

Well, lets see here, you have asked that numerous times of me. I have told you at least three times in the past. Maybe you should start taking notes.??

But as to why I did each one individually, simply because I couldn't figure out how to do two at a time.

Why does it matter to you anyways, when you have stated numerous times that you have only learned two things on this entire forum, and they weren't from me?
 
.....and the band played on.

Forever, forever, forever......
When that guy starts one of these things, man oh man.
Is there a cure? So glad you asked....
Shazam!...of course there is!
:smile::smile::smile::smile:
Lydia_E__Pinkhams_cures_and_claims.jpg
 
probably just didn't want the nit king to have it......i'm not worried about that thought because i doubt if you could learn any of it if you were in the matrix and got the direct download rick.....you still have yet to come up with any thing to prove yourself right or me and others wrong with anything more than your opinions.....not even a study or a video....just you flapping your fingers like some do their gums....

how did you say that? the hands dont matter tight or loose in regard to each stroke.....something to the order of, you do it consciously lol its not your hand......

i've posted videos, got a few processing also as we speak......and nothing from 5 speed shakesspear yet but fulff and fodder........

just throw more poop,
-Greyghost

Like I said, You have the same type of reading issue as that other guy.

That is not my position at all. I have been saying all along that the type of connection to the cue & level of pressure of such does make differences.

It has been many if not most of the instructors & science guys that have been saying 'grip pressure' makes NO DIFFERENCE.

I took a bit of issue when you said that a loose grip produces one type of stroke & a tight grip produces the other.

Neither one "produces" anything as there are many 'types' of connections to the cue that can be used loose or tight.

This is a discussion forum & there are no requirements to be part pf production company & make videos in order to be a member & enter into discussions.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
 
Last edited:
Well, lets see here, you have asked that numerous times of me. I have told you at least three times in the past. Maybe you should start taking notes.??

But as to why I did each one individually, simply because I couldn't figure out how to do two at a time.

Why does it matter to you anyways, when you have stated numerous times that you have only learned two things on this entire forum, and they weren't from me?

The focus of the matter is not regarding whether it was done individually or not other than that having to do it individual & personally shows the amount of time & effort that was exerted to get the result.

The 'question' that I have think everyone should know & understand is WHY did you do it.

That is where an issue perhaps exists & I think that that answer is rather obvious to many that have had exchanges with you.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
 
Forever, forever, forever......
When that guy starts one of these things, man oh man.
Is there a cure? So glad you asked....
Shazam!...of course there is!
:smile::smile::smile::smile:
View attachment 420975

I can only imagine what would happen if I were to say the things you say about me about your 'pool gods'.

Yet here, You do not even see that USE women & the very nature of women as a means to try to make fun of me. I doubt you will be getting the female vote.

That saying that is attributed to Socrates really seems to apply to YOU.

I am glad that I can provide a means for a satisfying existence for you & your time spent here on AZB.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.
 
This thread is analogous to something like "2+2 can't equal 4 because red isn't purple."
 
This thread is analogous to something like "2+2 can't equal 4 because red isn't purple."

It got "taken" in that direction.

Remember as your location is 'Hell' that it is almost impossible to see matters properly when satan is showing you the view as he invented deception.

All Best Wishes for You & Yours & All.
 
It got "taken" in that direction.

Remember as your location is 'Hell' that it is almost impossible to see matters properly when satan is showing you the view as he invented deception.

All Best Wishes for You & Yours & All.

Still a nicer place than AZ currently and at least Satan is consistent in what he says and shows.
 
Still a nicer place than AZ currently and at least Satan is consistent in what he says and shows.

Do you really think that satan (no capital letter from me) is consistent & do you think being consistent with deception & lies is admirable quality?

If you like Hell better than AZB why do you come to AZB?

All Best Wishes for All.
 
Do you really think that satan (no capital letter from me) is consistent & do you think being consistent with deception & lies is admirable quality?

If you like Hell better than AZB why do you come to AZB?

All Best Wishes for All.

For the same reason that batters take practice swings with weights.
 
And on top of that; I think Satan is just a metaphor, same as God. I've read enough religious text and script to reach the conclusion that it's all the same stuff. If anything I'm a Taoist.

You call it Heaven, others call it Nirvana, or moksha. Every religious practice points you in the same direction. My choice is Taoism/Buddhist mindfulness.
 
Not even anywhere close, Bruce.

And many times I am not erasing anything.

I think it is odd that you know about what Neil did & do not see an issue there.

Hmmm, I guess that I do "know" what Neil did. To a degree, I suppose, having been here through that time period. Matter of fact, I've been here through a lot of things. Seen a lot of stuff pass thru the 1's an 0's of this here forum.

Funny part is that I see the value most folks bring here. I've seen the good and the bad in many an argument. I observed the "Last Great CTE War" first hand. Many of our best and most respected members were involved at one point or another. Most of them still post here, some if only occasionally. Despite all of that, most acknowledge each other and their participation here, even if some do so begrudgingly.

I've seen conversations between heated (and in-theory "hated", tho I dislike how easily that term gets thrown around) members here. And I've seen them actually communicate. Many have met in person, despite their online disputes. Communicate. Acknowledge a point being made by the other.

And they all get it. They all belong here, as part of the community.

I'm not lecturing you, or chastising, which is the term you used last time. I'm just pointing out the facts. Yes, the facts "as I see them". I can't point them out any other way. I go out of my way to try and be the voice of moderation, to be diplomatic, to try and see both sides of a given discussion. Dare I say it....I try to be "objective".

It's not a part of being a bully. Or going along with the majority. I can mix it up if need be, and I've done so before, many times. I may not be able to run balls, but I can run sentences rather nicely. And not in "wall-of-text" mode, nor in zen-like double speak. I say what I mean and not ask that the reader figure it out.

I'm sorry that you feel the need to fight here. And make no mistake, that's what you do. You go right after anyone and anything that has popular support here. For some unknown reason. It's all well and good to question things, but to be like a dog with a bone about it, months later, well that's what gets especially tiresome.

Going after RandyG tops that list. RandyG hasn't said a cross word to anyone here in all my time as a member of this forum. Helps any and all who ask, in a very gentle and constructive manner. He is the last person I can imagine anyone having an issue with, yet you continue to hound him. And remember, he is a friend of the Mighty CJ, too.....if CJ likes him, why don't you?

I really hope you find a way to coexist with the rest of the forum, tho I doubt that you are interested in doing so.

Proceed to tell me how naive I am, in some condescending manner.
 
Like I said, You have the same type of reading issue as that other guy.

That is not my position at all. I have been saying all along that the type of connection to the cue & level of pressure of such does make differences.

It has been many if not most of the instructors & science guys that have been saying 'grip pressure' makes NO DIFFERENCE. really now show this to me rick i would love to see where Most meaning i'm sure scott, randy, dr. dave, bob jewett, pj maybe....I can say that grip pressure in regard to EITHER stroke has no outcome comparatively of how the CB reacts, everyting else matching as it should per say....but as if grip pressure has no effect on the results and timing of our particular stroke delieveries....i say dont hide the drugs rick, divide them sir.

I took a bit of issue when you said that a loose grip produces one type of stroke & a tight grip produces the other. sorry to burst your bubble but you can have issue all you like old man, they do work in specific ways, and regripping or firming up during delivery will cause a pendulum stroker to dip a hair with his/her elbow after contact generally speaking......do you even know the difference in how the hand ends up in position for either of said strokes? Thats a straight up question, because numer one its a tell tale sign, and number two ending orientation of the hand in a piston, and pendulum are opposiing.....the hand does somehting very specific in regards to orinetation for each speific stroke

Neither one "produces" anything as there are many 'types' of connections to the cue that can be used loose or tight.

This is a discussion forum & there are no requirements to be part pf production company & make videos in order to be a member & enter into discussions. just an easier way to say you either wont try, or you cant prove anything you say visually much less actually......and uhhhh i do not work for or own any production company rick....sometimes i film instructional lesson for people because its hard for people to lean via written word in something like this sport, which brings up a good point....how you think your helping anyone except for when you say they should just do what they do because they know best what is good and can work for them (for lack of your exact words and i'm sure even ugly people feel better if someone says they look fantastic today, not that i'm tyring to say that your lying to anyone to pump them up at all)...

Best Wishes for You & Yours.

you just must have multiple personalities that have no idea the others exist, because (not in this post i'm quoting, then next one that will go up) you contradict yourself and tattle tale as to your lack of knowledge when you say things....remember i've just been reading your drivel for only a few weeks, haven't had the pleasure of reading your concoctions for the past 4 years like everyone else here.
 
The focus of the matter is not regarding whether it was done individually or not other than that having to do it individual & personally shows the amount of time & effort that was exerted to get the result.

The 'question' that I have think everyone should know & understand is WHY did you do it.

That is where an issue perhaps exists & I think that that answer is rather obvious to many that have had exchanges with you.

Best Wishes for You & Yours.

it cant be any worse than breaking a record ad putting up basically 20k posts in 4 years.....20k posts of mindless drievel, politician "wont answer the question but will ask your own" bs......

just like you got mad at me right after you realized i was frineds with scott....and i mentioned that yea i know the math doesn't add up with CTE....PJ said thatlong ago....and PJ's a genius, if he says the math dont add up....then it doesn't. But that looks over the possible fact that the system is still objective because you never thought that it uses elements of our visual perspective and optics to acheive the end result. It really isn't far fetched.....because you didn't so much mind me speaking to you privately about how i see shots, and Im not alone, because Joey Gray shoots like that too he just calls it something else. You said oh well that could be objective because of a component that changes visually from shot to shot.....when i tied it all together because they have more simularities than you realize even though I dont pivot and all that mess.....you were a little sweetie pie to the greyone till that....then it was oh he's just a head in the sand pbia lackey......lmfao. How little you know sir....how little you know.

everyone watch his previous posts on here and the oter elbow drop thread....gonna bust him, but i warned him so he's proabbly proof reading the liviing crap out of his comments trying to figure out what he can do to keep me from proving he was doiing something that was causing something and doesn't even know it.......

its like pigeon superstition.....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGcEy_W48Kc&ab_channel=WolfgandL.L.Huarhua
 
Back
Top