When is it ok to "quit winner"?

Still laughing

Softshot
Not Dead Ted
Krupa
CocoboloCowboy
pulzcul
alstl
HitHrdNDraw
Neil
easy-a
supergreenman

Thanks for the opinions. LOL funny.
 
Quittin' winner is almost NEVER ok unless a time limit or number of sets was previously agreed upon before the first ball was hit! These modern day practices of "smart gambling", "quitting winner" and what not is just another sign of the decline of etiquette surrounding the games today. To overuse an overused term..."back in the day", if you pulled this kind of crap you'd get your ass stomped, stiffed or blackballed in a heartbeat.

Awww, c'mon!

Does anyone have any more questions about what the background is of the two different sides in this discussion?
 
Oh, the irony of it. The guy that quits ahead is so terrible that you feel justified in STEALING HIS money from the last set.:slap:

He's not terrible. And I'm not stealing. He's buying his way out of action. Happens all the time. Luckily, the people I play already know these things. I don't mess around with bad action.
 
He's not terrible. And I'm not stealing. He's buying his way out of action. Happens all the time. Luckily, the people I play already know these things. I don't mess around with bad action.

Sorry Drew, I don't think you can find any high ground on this stance. Stiffing someone is the worst sin of gambling.

Quitting winner an unwritten rule? As far as I'm concerned the only rules that matter are the ones agreed upon at the beginning of the match.

if you agree to 3 sets, then 3 sets it is. It is acceptable to ask for another set after that, but the other player has no obligation to agree.

If there is no agreement, then any player can quit at any time.
 
And wondering...specifically from those that are offended at being quit on:

Is it also nitty to not offer double or nothings until the winner is even? I know that is how winners become WINNERS, so let's not jump to what could happen, just if it is 'required' by you.
 
As a winner I don't believe you are obligated to play for any period of time. For example, if you want to have dinner you have every right in the world to stop playing and get something to eat.
 
I played a buddy of mine last week, and after 2 sets, he quit winner on me. I wasn't playing that bad, he was leading by only a small margin. He had no excuse as to why he quit, just seemed like he won, and wanted to leave without letting me give him a good match and win my money back.

This has happened before, and I gave a few guys some serious flak about it. When I am in the lead, I always give my opponent the chance to either even up the sets, or win back his money. I believe this is an "unwritten rule", but how many of you follow this?

My question would be if you won the 1st two sets, would your buddy quit? If the answer is no, he would keep playing, he's giving you odds on the money so why sweat it. He is minimizing his potential winnings while he would lose much more to you - what's wrong with that? You did say you were buddies so just keep playing: win 5 to his 2 every time, it's fun :thumbup:. Heck, send him a cab if the weather's bad ;).

I play a guy 2-3 times a week when we can and we quit at the same time each day. He knows he could quit anytime he wants, winner or loser, if he has an emergency plumbing job or he gets aggravated w/the juke box blaring crap. Life is too short.

It sounds like if you stop playing all these guys that quit, you will not have anyone else to play - and we all love playing don't we?

Dave
 
It has nothing to do with making a living or being able to afford it. It's about the better play (at that spot) should win. And if you keep playing, the better player SHOULD win in the long run. Funny things happen and the rolls can go against you in a set. If you feel you should have won, play again. If they don't give you the chance to play again, then they know they got luck and don't want to give the money back.

Always discuss how much time you can play before matching up, saves a lot of crying on either side.

Exactly, I have a couple guys who I play regularly and they will always quit if I'm shooting my best and/or their game is off. If you let them do this, it's like playing the casino with stacked odds. Especially if you are willing to play when your game isn't clicking perfectly, hoping to find your stroke. For these individuals, ahead of time, we decide on a minimum of 3 sets, play until a set time, a long set to 13 games for bigger money, or 2 out of 3sets for $___.

These problems are amplified when playing by the game. 2 weeks ago I played friend $5 a rack and won 7 straight. He quit then, even though he still had plenty of time to play and went and played one pocket with someone else. He wasn't willing to lose more. Just a different mindset than me.

I I had lost 7 straight to a player that I know I can beat, I would feel that my losing had nothing to do with my play, only that my opponent was in stroke. I would feel that if I waited, maybe I would get opportunity to have a similiar run. In fact I would have asked to up it to $10-20 a game to make up the loss. To me if you quit early you never know how well it might have gone, you are limiting yourself.

The ones I like will play until closing every time, but they are few and far between. With them you just play and the best man wins...simple, beautiful and very profitable.
 
Last edited:
NEVER...you must lose all the money you won before you leave.
Then you are not a nit and considered GREAT action :D
 
And wondering...specifically from those that are offended at being quit on:

Is it also nitty to not offer double or nothings until the winner is even? I know that is how winners become WINNERS, so let's not jump to what could happen, just if it is 'required' by you.

This is really not complicated.

You and I play $20/game.
You win two games and then you remember that you have to go to work.
You quit.
You are a nit.

You and I play $20/game.
We go back and forth for several hours.
You say, "I must leave in an hour."
I say, "Okay."
This is perfectly acceptable.

You and I play $20/game.
You win 3 games.
You say, "I must leave in an hour."
I say, "Let's play a race to 3 for $60."
You say, "No. Let's just play $20/game."
This is perfectly acceptable.

You and I play $50/set.
You win 3 sets and I say, "That's it. I'm done."
This is perfectly acceptable.

You and I play $50/set.
You win 3 sets.
I ask for a spot.
You oblige.
You lose 2 sets and say, "Let's play even again."
I say, "No."
You quit.
This is perfectly acceptable. You are winner playing even, I am winner with the spot.

You and I play for $5.
You win.
I say, "Double the bet."
You say, "Okay."
You win again.
I say, "Play for $20."
You say, "No."
I quit.
This is perfectly acceptable.


Do you notice how the loser quits each time? When you start playing, you should assume that you will keep playing forever or until one of you is broke. If you cannot play forever, then give sufficient notice, as in, "I have to leave in 3 hours."

This doesn't mean you have to let the guy get even to get quit. It means you have to keep beating him until he's had enough. I suppose this is the difference in mentality between winners and pussies. When the bet changes, the game starts over. When the spot changes, the game starts over. But you gotta keep playing the same way until the loser quits.

I've quit winner before. Usually, it is because better action just walked in the room. I always forfeit out the last set. I'm buying my way out of the game.

In the end, you probably shouldn't gamble if you're going to be a nit.
 
NEVER...you must lose all the money you won before you leave.
Then you are not a nit and considered GREAT action :D

Right! It seems that the only time you see everyone happy is when matches break even. I can't count the number of times I've heard money players report, "We broke even," almost as if they were proud of it. If that's the goal, why gamble at all?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not supporting gambling here. Gambling at pool is all about two people trying to take money from each other. Why should things like rules and etiquette apply to that?

Roger
 
I played a buddy of mine last week, and after 2 sets, he quit winner on me. I wasn't playing that bad, he was leading by only a small margin. He had no excuse as to why he quit, just seemed like he won, and wanted to leave without letting me give him a good match and win my money back.

This has happened before, and I gave a few guys some serious flak about it. When I am in the lead, I always give my opponent the chance to either even up the sets, or win back his money. I believe this is an "unwritten rule", but how many of you follow this?

Sounds like your buddy is a pretty good hustler.
 
This is really not complicated...the difference in mentality between winners and pussies...

Well, the jab aside...

A fine reply...but you failed to addess the scenario where it is none of your business why I choose to play or not to play!
 
...just keep playing: win 5 to his 2 every time, it's fun :thumbup:. Heck, send him a cab if the weather's bad ;)....we all love playing don't we?

Dave

Agreed- I have a friend that plays damn near exactly like I do and we have probably played 1000+ games in the years I have known him, and we are probably about 60/40 with him coming out winner rarely. Today is only one day.
 
Back
Top