SUPERSTAR said:So to not be a nit, a winning player has to accomodate the losing player for whatever he/she want is that it?
Whatever you say man.
Your money, your choices.
Which is fine. But to say someone is a nit because they WON'T is completely ridiculous. If they are up 12 games, and they quit without warning, i will agree that they can be classified as a nit, but not cause they won't change the bet.
If i'm playing someone for 400 a game in one pocket, and they are stuck 3 games after like 6 hours, and want to play for 800, it's not going to happen. Maybe at 5 a game 9 ball and i'm up 10 games in 20 minutes, but not at 200 a game where i'm up 6 games after 3 hours.
The bet AND time factor into the whole equation so take that into consideration.
If you do change the bet, and you end up on the losing end of it a few times when they go stellar or go and coke up in the bathroom, you will change your mind. You might still want to do it, but if you go broke enough times taking your shot, you'll learn.
Cause im my book, if i double the bet, i am not quitting. So if i go down the toilet, i go down the toilet.
Would all these people that accept the doubling of the bet that you know be willing to go down the toilet at that new bet? Or would they quit once they got even?
Cause to me, THAT'S being a nit. Trying to get a big win, but not willing to lose a dime in return.
I know lots of gamblers who won't ever change the game, and that's at 5 bucks a game, or 500, and they are the furthest thing from nits. They are GREAT ACTION.
My whole point is that if someone wanted to lay it all on the line, they could have announced that at the beginning, and saved everyone the trouble, instead of pussyfooting around at a cheaper bet to feel each other out.
Bet it all and get it over with.
Don't make a game, and when you have the losing end of it, want them to "help you out" getting unstuck. Forget that garbage. 'If that is the case, why bother gambling at all?
If they are gonna go off, they are gonna go off at whatever price you set.
Man, you are tripping all over yourself. The e.g. of a NIT that you disagreed with was "someone 12 games up and refuses to raise the bet".....PERIOD
Then you went off on how if I was 12 game loser etc. someone who is 12 game loser and wants to double the bet is NOT a NIT.
Now you have a winning player having to always accomodate a loser, being 3 games up, 10 games up, 6 games up, people going stellar and coking up and going down the toilet etc.
THE EXAMPLE WAS "someone 12 games up and refuses to raise the bet". This is what you disagreed to and per the example you are a NIT.....