Where's the Cue of the Year 2015 Thread?

Thanks to those who answered my original question.

What was confusing about the new process. You submit your nomination and that was also your vote. Now thanks to some of the same nits that can't help but get into business that's not their own, we don't have a popular thread to view the best work of 2015.
 
skins said:
The "idea" would have worked FINE if you and others would have just went with the flow and givin' it a chance!!
Click to expand...

Bro, that thread had made it to a whopping two and a half pages, of which the VAST majority of the posts were cues and/or votes. And those who commented about not liking the format (myself included) also voted. We voted, as requested. You shut it down anyway.

If a few comments about format made you pull out of it all that early, then YOU didn't give it a chance.

skins said:
...IT'S OBVIOUS THOUGH THAT YOU AND THOSE LIKE YOU SURE DIDN'T OR YOU(S) WOULD HAVE MADE CIVIL SUGGESTION(S) TO MAKE MY VISION WORK RATHER THAN WHINE AND MOAN!!!!!
Click to expand...

Civil suggestions... you mean like when I said that the old format/a simple poll would be better? That seemed like a civil suggestion. But you chose not to listen. So myself and others adhered to your new format... and you got bent out of shape and shut it down anyway. After just 2.5 pages.
 
Bob Farr said:
Thanks to those who answered my original question.

What was confusing about the new process. You submit your nomination and that was also your vote. Now thanks to some of the same nits that can't help but get into business that's not their own, we don't have a popular thread to view the best work of 2015.
Click to expand...

Bob, this issue didn't start till I questioned Jamie about which cue he was voting for, his Durbin that he posted OR Jimmy's Boar, posted after his, which then he made the comment along the lines of no cue could match Jimmy's entry. The rules were very clear in my first post as to voting and I wanted to make that clear. Jamie then questioned me again regarding multiple entries and I responded very clearly, as in my first post. That's when the "nits" surfaced. I believed I was being "questioned" about my method which was 1st, said in my contact to Jamie, 2nd, explained in my first post in the thread, and 3rd explained at least two other times all the while being attacked for the method which, as I think you knew,would have worked well.

My decision to squash the thread was due to the fact that I no longer wanted to be a part of something that had negative connotations when my only desire was to let those express their feelings towards the cue that intrigued them so much during 2015 that they were compelled to vote and MAYBE share their story and tell us why.

Maybe that still can happen. I just won't be a part of it....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top