Who do you like in this matchup?

Bar Table Race 30 9 Ball

  • Shane Van Boening

    Votes: 66 75.0%
  • Larry Nevel

    Votes: 22 25.0%

  • Total voters
    88
well suprnova you've got my attention once again with some of your "opinions". Larry and Jesse played 2 sets on the bar table 5 years ago during the vnea 500 beans each with larry winning both. please tell me you understand that two sets doesn't put larry in a different class when you are speaking about 2 world class bar table players. that's what this thread is about "bar tables" not big tables! to the poster who wondered about larry playing for big $$$. Larry is the most talented player I've ever seen. But something between Larry's ears doesn't allow him to gamble at the same level he plays tournaments. to say the least he is his own worst enemy!. I've been around all of these players and know Jesse and Larry on a personal level so I think my opinions have some validity to them. It is a coin flip when speaking about these players playing on a bar table. they are all capable of putting big packages together.
 
suprnva said:
Larry can beat anyone in the world, at anytime, at any game.

I'd like to play Larry in a game of connect four, race to 100. At 4am, in madagascar.

YOUR MOVE...
 
Cheeshead

Thank you for saying what i have been trying to say its a coin flip and bowman and SVB are road players all they do is gamble thats why Bowman is not a pro when he played svb svb wanted to take him with him on the road but bowman just had a little girl he only plays a couple hours a week but still manages to go to the olympia of pool last month and got first out of i believe 200+ players. Not to take away from Larry he has been killing People on tour but for the cheese its a whole nother ballgame what is a 500 dollar set to someone that has been playing those since he was 15
 
I give up. You all win. Shane and Jesse are both better than Larry. Larry can't play a lick. I don't care anymore. I'm done with this topic.

Flame away!
 
suprnva said:
I find it funny actually. It kinda seems like they don't have the mental game to play him. I'm not a great player by any means, but I'm pretty good, and I've played people before that do the same things that Larry does when he gets upset and it doesn't bother me one bit. So why is it that pros and big time gamblers have such an issue mentally against someone like Larry? Maybe it's the fact that they have to focus so hard to beat him because they know if they make the smallest mistake he will fire back at them much harder then they can. Larry can beat anyone in the world, at anytime, at any game.

People can attack me all day long, it doesn't bother me one bit. I'm just sick of everyone thinking that Shane is God and Shane will beat Larry with no problems but Shane himself will not play Larry. I don't know his reasoning, but Shane won't play Larry and that should tell everyone something about Larry's game.

I was talking about his reputation for having a bad temper, and throwing fits during matches. Many players won't play him at all because of it. I am interested in your thoughts on that subject
 
If his temper is as bad as it sounds on here, why would SVB (100lbs soaking wet) want to deal with him? Just because someone doesn't want to gamble with you doesn't mean they are the dog in a match. There are a few guys in my town I could win some money off but I'd have to kill them when it was over so I don't bother with the nuts.

Suprnva, I think you've watched Larry too much. When you see a top player like Larry play all the time you get to see them put huge packages together and perfect play sometimes. You tend to think of that instead of their average play and don't realize if you watched some other top pros play daily you'd see the same things.

BTW, I think one race to 30 is a coin flip in this match but I'd take Shane if I had to bet. If they played 10 race to 30's over a couple weeks I think Shane's consistency would wear him down if he could deal with the fits. One race to 30 really means nothing.
 
I agree

ccshrimper said:
If his temper is as bad as it sounds on here, why would SVB (100lbs soaking wet) want to deal with him? Just because someone doesn't want to gamble with you doesn't mean they are the dog in a match. There are a few guys in my town I could win some money off but I'd have to kill them when it was over so I don't bother with the nuts.

Suprnva, I think you've watched Larry too much. When you see a top player like Larry play all the time you get to see them put huge packages together and perfect play sometimes. You tend to think of that instead of their average play and don't realize if you watched some other top pros play daily you'd see the same things.

BTW, I think one race to 30 is a coin flip in this match but I'd take Shane if I had to bet. If they played 10 race to 30's over a couple weeks I think Shane's consistency would wear him down if he could deal with the fits. One race to 30 really means nothing.

One race to 30, it's a toss. Shane having a slight advantage. I've seen both play. Larry has that monster break, and I've seen him play flawless. Over 10 sessions, I'd pick Shane. to win
 
It's a toss up either way. But if you want to give Larry Nevel 10 games going to 30 on the barbox... I'd nearly go broke betting on Larry. They both have MONSTER breaks on the barbox and at their level on the barbox it's who is getting a shot on the break and controlling the table.

I'd love to see this matchup. I'd like to see TAR do a race to 100 on the barbox between Shane & Larry... race to 30 8-ball, race to 30 9-ball, and race to 40 10-ball.

I might have to bet on Larry in the matchup. He is way more creative than Shane, he pockets ball just as well, and he has been playing more on the barbox than Shane. He has been winning many GSBT & the Viking tour barbox events. If Larry can maintain his temperment, I say he takes this match. But it would be tough to bet either way.
 
Back
Top