This just came up in our local Facebook pool group, which is very active with thousands of members. Here are the details as they were presented:
-The player is known for playing big money games/sets. Like 300 minimum/game.
-His opponent is a guy he's played before, and gets in action a lot.
-Opponent says the same guy is backing him as the last time they played.
-Opponent loses $2K.
-Player reaches out to backer to collect.
-Backer says he only gave opponent permission to play for 30/game, and offers to pay the player based on that.
-Player wants his 2K.
The question is, who would you say is responsible for that debt?
-The player is known for playing big money games/sets. Like 300 minimum/game.
-His opponent is a guy he's played before, and gets in action a lot.
-Opponent says the same guy is backing him as the last time they played.
-Opponent loses $2K.
-Player reaches out to backer to collect.
-Backer says he only gave opponent permission to play for 30/game, and offers to pay the player based on that.
-Player wants his 2K.
The question is, who would you say is responsible for that debt?