All around in their prime?
Nick Varner and Mike Sigel. I can’t honestly say that Efren was better than those two.
I think what Sigel accomplished really escapes most players who simply didn’t see him. When the game was transitioning from 14.1 to 9-ball, he dominated the tournament scene in both disciplines without missing a beat. There weren’t many one pocket tournaments, yet Sigel has a major tournament win.
The reason why we say that Varner has World Championships in 5 disciplines is because we include Grady Matthews’s World Bank Pool Championships held in Maine in November with 50 entrants, and we include the Derby City Bank Pool Division in 1999. That’s two “world championships” that might not stand the litmus test for many.
Nothing to sneeze at for Varner, my favorite player, but a little eye brow raising.
Efren clearly is the best at one pocket, and dominated the DCC all-around, but by the time DCC started, Sigel had quit the game years earlier, and Nick was on the slow down.
...and though Mosconi is known really only as the greatest snooker player...
That's news to me.
Great post. I think Efren is great, but he has been elevated to a status higher than his actual skill level. Shots like the Z shot against Strickland elevate his legend,
I think an in his prime Efren would struggle with in their primes Sigel and Varner, and though Mosconi is known really only as the greatest snooker player, he was also one of the best 3 cushion players in the world. and I think would have beat pretty much anyone at any game. He toured with the world snooker champion past his prime and won half of the snooker matches.
Or, he could be talking about Cuelemans, the nine ball champ.
Enjoy these conversations though, while we have them. Generations from now, the discussion of the best all around player won't even include straight pool. It will only be rotation games, one pocket, and bar box whatever. Be glad we live in a generation when we can at least remember straight pool, and the ones who played it.
All the best,
WW
Great post. I think Efren is great, but he has been elevated to a status higher than his actual skill level. Shots like the Z shot against Strickland elevate his legend,
I think an in his prime Efren would struggle with in their primes Sigel and Varner, and though Mosconi is known really only as the greatest snooker player, he was also one of the best 3 cushion players in the world. and I think would have beat pretty much anyone at any game. He toured with the world snooker champion past his prime and won half of the snooker matches.
Mosconi toured with Greenleaf playing straight pool and won about half the games.
Not snooker.
Ten Ball or Nine Ball both players in their prime, efren or shane who wins? Race to 150 winner breaks.
Ah, democracy at it’s finest.....probably a fair amount of voters who can’t hit the end rail.
Democracy carries the seed of it’s own destruction