WHY DO THE HEATHEN CONTINUE TO RAGE... Part Three

Low500

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
The critics of CTE aiming, lost forever in their bigotry and stubborness, miss out on many critical aspects of the method for playing the game better.
Those who have trouble (primarily because of not putting in the table time) with "poking the head out" for zeroing in on the NISL, do not know that they have an alternate. IF they open their minds and own the master manual for improving pool shooting written by Stan Shuffett...."Center Pocket Music".
As students, we are instructed that if we "JUST MUST" use our conventional line of sighting for full stance alignments, then PRO ONE (discussed in chapter 24 of the book) will take care of our needs as one of the ways to accomplish the job at hand.
I recall early in my studies, hearing Stan Shuffett state that "when you become proficient at poking that head out and stepping the cue ball, you're going to soon notice that all shots will begin to appear in your vision as straight in shots.
I thought this was one of the craziest things I'd ever heard...."HOW CAN THAT BE?", I thought. "How is a cut shot going to look like a straight in shot?" (NOW I know, after intensive study and rehearsals, exactly what he meant. YOU can enjoy that pleasure as well in your game)
CTE Aiming is a progressive science, veiled in allegory, and illustrated by material points.
In the Master Encyclopedia of Improving Your Pool Game, "CENTER POCKET MUSIC" the student is provided an entire volume of those material points.
CTE Book Resized smaller.jpg
 
Why does there seem to be a need for CTE proponents to personally attack those on the other side by referring to them as Bigots, etc.? That is a VERY derogatory term & amounts to an ad hominem attack of fellow members.

Mr. Shuffett's CTE or Pro1 or whatever other name it may go by is NOT any kind of Science, not progressive or otherwise. It actually goes against what Science says. Hence it can not be any kind of objective system nor method. The proponents simply refuse to face & acknowledge that reality that is backed up & actually supported by Real Science.

The line you of...
***Inside every 'progressive' there exists a totalitarian fighting to get out and tell everyone how to live their lives

certainly seems to be true.
 
This is just a click bait advertisement...

I have zero doubt Low500 just does these to stir the pot so to speak. No value added and mere spam at the lowest level. Surprised it gets a free pass.
 
The critics of CTE aiming, lost forever in their bigotry and stubborness, miss out on many critical aspects of the method for playing the game better.
Those who have trouble (primarily because of not putting in the table time) with "poking the head out" for zeroing in on the NISL, do not know that they have an alternate. IF they open their minds and own the master manual for improving pool shooting written by Stan Shuffett...."Center Pocket Music".
As students, we are instructed that if we "JUST MUST" use our conventional line of sighting for full stance alignments, then PRO ONE (discussed in chapter 24 of the book) will take care of our needs as one of the ways to accomplish the job at hand.
I recall early in my studies, hearing Stan Shuffett state that "when you become proficient at poking that head out and stepping the cue ball, you're going to soon notice that all shots will begin to appear in your vision as straight in shots.
I thought this was one of the craziest things I'd ever heard...."HOW CAN THAT BE?", I thought. "How is a cut shot going to look like a straight in shot?" (NOW I know, after intensive study and rehearsals, exactly what he meant. YOU can enjoy that pleasure as well in your game)
CTE Aiming is a progressive science, veiled in allegory, and illustrated by material points.
In the Master Encyclopedia of Improving Your Pool Game, "CENTER POCKET MUSIC" the student is provided an entire volume of those material points.
View attachment 597225
🥾:poop: Oh no, my boots!

More of the same... 🔥 flame war bait, then wondering why you get poop on your shoes. What if I told you that you could also VASTLY improve your pool game by taking responsibility for your own actions and not living with a permanent victimhood complex? CTE works, why do you feel you have to be the underdog/victim. Be your own man/woman and stop letting your own mind make you the victim! Luckily, pool is the ultimate game for working on other issues in life. I have faith in you @Low500, you can overcome your victimhood complex and your pool game will JUMP to the next level.

I have zero doubt Low500 just does these to stir the pot so to speak. No value added and mere spam at the lowest level. Surprised it gets a free pass.

As I said before, he lights a bag of dog crap on fire, puts it on the doorstep of his own house, then gets angry he get crap on his shoes when he stomps the flaming bag of dog poo to put the fire out. It's so tiring to watch someone play the victim all the time.
 
🥾:poop: Oh no, my boots!

More of the same... 🔥 flame war bait, then wondering why you get poop on your shoes. What if I told you that you could also VASTLY improve your pool game by taking responsibility for your own actions and not living with a permanent victimhood complex? CTE works, why do you feel you have to be the underdog/victim. Be your own man/woman and stop letting your own mind make you the victim! Luckily, pool is the ultimate game for working on other issues in life. I have faith in you @Low500, you can overcome your victimhood complex and your pool game will JUMP to the next level.



As I said before, he lights a bag of dog crap on fire, puts it on the doorstep of his own house, then gets angry he get crap on his shoes when he stomps the flaming bag of dog poo to put the fire out. It's so tiring to watch someone play the victim all the time.
All of the proponents of it who have posted here including Mr. Shuffett himself have played victim. That is a tactic that is used by Leftist Democrats nearly all of the time. I am not saying that they are such, but they try to employ the same tactic as though it is some means of actual logical argument. They tie it to the hip of attacking the messenger.
 
All of the proponents of it who have posted here including Mr. Shuffett himself have played victim. That is a tactic that is used by Leftist Democrats nearly all of the time. I am not saying that they are such, but they try to employ the same tactic as though it is some means of actual logical argument. They tie it to the hip of attacking the messenger.
It won't be long before the poor blighters organize a "CTE Lives Matter" chapter.

As the reality of irrelevancy sets in, they will become more and more irrational. Will they demand "cte" ONLY tables at rooms? It could happen.
 
Last edited:
🥾:poop: Oh no, my boots!
As I said before, he lights a bag of dog crap on fire, puts it on the doorstep of his own house, then gets angry he get crap on his shoes when he stomps the flaming bag of dog poo to put the fire out. It's so tiring to watch someone play the victim all the time.
If what you say is accurate about it being tiring, then you're kinda' dumb to keep sitting there watching it aren't you?
The Ignore feature is user friendly. Try it, it works,.... just like I've done right now for you.
Picture of How Much I Care.jpg
 
All of the proponents of it who have posted here including Mr. Shuffett himself have played victim. That is a tactic that is used by Leftist Democrats nearly all of the time. I am not saying that they are such, but they try to employ the same tactic as though it is some means of actual logical argument. They tie it to the hip of attacking the messenger.
Welcome to Ignore City.
Bye from Curly Bill.JPG
 
If what you say is accurate about it being tiring, then you're kinda' dumb to keep sitting there watching it aren't you?
The Ignore feature is user friendly. Try it, it works,.... just like I've done right now for you.
View attachment 597292
I guess my faith in him was misplaced. Poop on the boots for life.
 
Thomas Sowell, one of the world's foremost intellectuals and deep thinkers, has this to say about those who wander in chosen darkness and enjoy projecting their ignorance through twisted ridicule.
His brilliance can be applied to choices made in the game of pocket billiards as well as in life.
Selah.
Thomas Sowell.jpg
 
All of the proponents of it who have posted here including Mr. Shuffett himself have played victim. That is a tactic that is used by Leftist Democrats nearly all of the time. I am not saying that they are such, but they try to employ the same tactic as though it is some means of actual logical argument. They tie it to the hip of attacking the messenger.
You played the victim card numerous times yesterday. And it was your first day posting.
 
Mr. Shuffett's CTE or Pro1 or whatever other name it may go by is NOT any kind of Science, not progressive or otherwise. It actually goes against what Science says. Hence it can not be any kind of objective system nor method. The proponents simply refuse to face & acknowledge that reality that is backed up & actually supported by Real Science.
Yet when asked for your proof to back up this statement, nothing credible was offered.
 
I am no victim. I merely pointed out bad behavior.

Did you someone recently state that they would refrain from being a shit stirrer or the like?

Mr. Shuffett's CTE is in no way any manner of science such as physics, geometry, biology, chemistry, etc.
If anyone requires some sort of specific proof of that reality, then such says very much about them.
If anyone thinks that Mr. Shuffett's CTE is a form of science, then that may be the crux of the issue.
The world is full of people who are delusional to the realities of this world.
I am not one of those people. That was a preemptive strike against the immature juvenile turn the table BS attempt at debate by those who seem to think that they get to control & dictate to others how a discussion must go while they ignore questions to them, etc.
 
Inanimate objects or methods do no make claims.

It was said that Stan Shuffett's CTE is a Progressive Science. That is simply not true.

SS's CTE is NOT "purely" a visual system. Actually it is not any kind of "system" at all, but even Mr. Shuffett has said that it is both visual & physical.

Geometry certainly can be used regarding sight lines, stick lines, etc. However, Geometry will not be used to "figure out" the Geometry of CTE because CTE is NOT what it is said to be. It is not based in any science & the assertions of what it is & why it is supposed to work go against ALL science.
 
Many posting in the aiming forum in support of CTE seem to not even be aware that one can start with a false premise & then make logical arguments(not that they actually do) to a conclusion & that conclusion will be false because the premise was false.

They pull people like me into making posts because of the many false statements that they make, especially when they quote an individual to make those false statements to a particular individual.
 
Inanimate objects or methods do no make claims.

It was said that Stan Shuffett's CTE is a Progressive Science. That is simply not true.

SS's CTE is NOT "purely" a visual system. Actually it is not any kind of "system" at all, but even Mr. Shuffett has said that it is both visual & physical.

Geometry certainly can be used regarding sight lines, stick lines, etc. However, Geometry will not be used to "figure out" the Geometry of CTE because CTE is NOT what it is said to be. It is not based in any science & the assertions of what it is & why it is supposed to work go against ALL science.
Who said it's progressive science?
It is a purely visual system.
CTE is everything Stan says it is and in my opinion much much more.

You can keep making shit up, maybe someone will believe it. Hell you might even convince yourself that you are correct.

And you still haven't posted that scientific proof yet. Don't forget to do that.
 
Many posting in the aiming forum in support of CTE seem to not even be aware that one can start with a false premise & then make logical arguments(not that they actually do) to a conclusion & that conclusion will be false because the premise was false.

They pull people like me into making posts because of the many false statements that they make, especially when they quote an individual to make those false statements to a particular individual.
Those starting with the false premise have no idea what CTE really is.
 
Back
Top