Barry C. said:
If you venture over there, you'll find no thread topics concerning AZ banishments or the monitor at AZ. It's of little interest.
What you'll find is a great bunch of folks enjoying the freedom to discuss their pool interests and not spending all their time editing posts and looking over their shoulder. A place where you can speak your mind.
Barry
There's no rules over there?
I've been checking out the other forum for the last few months and I honestly haven't seen anything there that couldn't be posted over here so I don't know what lack of freedom is being referred to.
Edit- This is wrong. There is much more freedom apparently in "Jimbo's" section if you like to see name calling and read a lot of swearing which I have to admit is kinda funny in some ways but is that really the direction to go? I kind of wonder how long his new forum host will let this stuff continue? To each his or her own I guess.
End of Edit.
I don't have any serious personal or professional connection with anyone here and I prefer it that way because it gives me a certain degree of freedom.
I don't know Jimbo at all except for what I've seen here. I honestly never really noticed anything that made him more significant than any other posters here, but maybe I missed some things, I don't know. I did catch the thread that he got banned on and I'm at a total loss to understand why he took the path that he did.
I guess the cold reality of forum posting is you're only as significant as your last post!
I'm even further baffled by the response from other members as if Jimbo had no responsibilty or control in what happened. From the sidelines, one would think from all the drama that Jimbo was the Nelson friggin' Mandella of the forum world or something.
I saw the thread in question before it was deleted and to me it came across as antagonistic. Whether it was deliberately antagonistic or not really isn't relevant. I don't think it was the fact that Jimbo's new home was so much mentioned, as perhaps the context of starting a new thread about it was. Not exactly a high crime even if it was deliberately antagonistic, but it seemed out of place enough to get the moderators attention. Again, not a high crime.
I also strongly agree with the previous posters who say that a PM should have been sent as a matter of courtesy to more thoroughly explain the deletion and perhaps allow a private exchange to help avoid any feeling of insult.
Live and learn I guess.
Edit - I was trying to give Matt24 the benefit of the doubt, but after seeing a post by him on "Jimbo's" forum, I realize he didn't deserve it. I've posted the contents a few posts down.