SlickRick, I am not sure that I am understanding the point of your post, and I am even less certain that you are understanding the point of mine. I know that I do tend to be wordy so here I will try to be succinct.
The original question is "Will Snooker catch on in the US?". Simply due to space requirements, the answer is "No!" as far as private residences go. Of course there will always be a smattering of beautiful, private, home tables just like there are a few large homes that have indoor bowling alleys. Just not very many. So snooker will not catch on through personal, private means.
So that leaves public commercial enterprise to bring snooker to the masses as an industry. The point that I am trying to make is that many posters seem to be saying that if only there were more tables available, snooker would become more popular and then, perhaps, it would catch on. I am stating the exact opposite. If an entrepreneur opens a snooker venue with the attitude that "If you build it, they will come", he will be sorely disappointed. That is what I meant by "jamming down their throats"....just because you make snooker tables available does not mean that people are going to play the game. Players have to become aware of and curious about the game first, then begin to think that they would like to try it out if they get the opportunity, then (and if) this were to begin to happen everywhere with a LOT of people (such as through exposure on television or some other means), finally the business world could fill the need for an actual demand for snooker rather than just speculating about it.
Many here probably do not realize that snooker's real popularity in England began with the advent of color television....early 70's. There had been very little previous tv coverage because, let's face it, a game that is based on colors doesn't make a whole lot of sense in a black and white world. The BBC experimented with coverage of snooker to show off the bright colors on telly and the popularity of the game itself surged as a result.
The original question is "Will Snooker catch on in the US?". Simply due to space requirements, the answer is "No!" as far as private residences go. Of course there will always be a smattering of beautiful, private, home tables just like there are a few large homes that have indoor bowling alleys. Just not very many. So snooker will not catch on through personal, private means.
So that leaves public commercial enterprise to bring snooker to the masses as an industry. The point that I am trying to make is that many posters seem to be saying that if only there were more tables available, snooker would become more popular and then, perhaps, it would catch on. I am stating the exact opposite. If an entrepreneur opens a snooker venue with the attitude that "If you build it, they will come", he will be sorely disappointed. That is what I meant by "jamming down their throats"....just because you make snooker tables available does not mean that people are going to play the game. Players have to become aware of and curious about the game first, then begin to think that they would like to try it out if they get the opportunity, then (and if) this were to begin to happen everywhere with a LOT of people (such as through exposure on television or some other means), finally the business world could fill the need for an actual demand for snooker rather than just speculating about it.
Many here probably do not realize that snooker's real popularity in England began with the advent of color television....early 70's. There had been very little previous tv coverage because, let's face it, a game that is based on colors doesn't make a whole lot of sense in a black and white world. The BBC experimented with coverage of snooker to show off the bright colors on telly and the popularity of the game itself surged as a result.
Last edited: