OK, well since i didnt wanna post a thread along with everyone elses, i decided to start Part 2 to this subject.
Now my whole view on this subject is, that i dont see how a guy or a women, should have any advantage. I mean obviously the guy will normally have a more powerful break, but, after that, i dont see why a guy should have a advantage over a women.
I mean isnt someone like Allison Fisher or Sarah, doing the same thing as a John Archer or Bustemante.
And if one of any of the Top pro's either male or female, if they drop a ball on the break, 90% of the time they should be able to run the rack.
And i have seen many of times, on TV where Allison Fisher broke and ran out the rack. So you know that if she kept on breaking and made a ball on the break, she could be able to run the rack, many times over.
And this goes for any of the Top Female pool players too.
I also dont see the big deal with getting beat by a women in pool? I have been beat in a tournament by women a couple times, and i just shrug it off and look at it like, hey she played a good game, i didnt make a couple shots here n there, So obviously she played a better game and beat me.
And thats the way it should be, the better player should win a match 99% of the time. Cuz your always going to have someone who happens to get lucky n stuff.
So if a guy and a women, played each other to a race to 11, and did alternating breaks, i dont see how a guy would have the advantage?
Maybe i am just blind lol, and sometimes i play like that, but i honestly dont see how a women or a guy has any advantage over each other.
Like i said earlier, the only advantage i see a guy having is on the break, cuz he can create more power, and get the balls to mix better. or maybe drop more balls on the break.
But thats just my two cents on the Subject.
Now my whole view on this subject is, that i dont see how a guy or a women, should have any advantage. I mean obviously the guy will normally have a more powerful break, but, after that, i dont see why a guy should have a advantage over a women.
I mean isnt someone like Allison Fisher or Sarah, doing the same thing as a John Archer or Bustemante.
And if one of any of the Top pro's either male or female, if they drop a ball on the break, 90% of the time they should be able to run the rack.
And i have seen many of times, on TV where Allison Fisher broke and ran out the rack. So you know that if she kept on breaking and made a ball on the break, she could be able to run the rack, many times over.
And this goes for any of the Top Female pool players too.
I also dont see the big deal with getting beat by a women in pool? I have been beat in a tournament by women a couple times, and i just shrug it off and look at it like, hey she played a good game, i didnt make a couple shots here n there, So obviously she played a better game and beat me.
And thats the way it should be, the better player should win a match 99% of the time. Cuz your always going to have someone who happens to get lucky n stuff.
So if a guy and a women, played each other to a race to 11, and did alternating breaks, i dont see how a guy would have the advantage?
Maybe i am just blind lol, and sometimes i play like that, but i honestly dont see how a women or a guy has any advantage over each other.
Like i said earlier, the only advantage i see a guy having is on the break, cuz he can create more power, and get the balls to mix better. or maybe drop more balls on the break.
But thats just my two cents on the Subject.