...................
Last edited:
...good at a lot of things or great at only one thing? Here is the catch...if you choose the latter, you have no control over what you're great at. You might not like it.
The reason I ask is I was having a conversation with a friend about a well known pro player buddy of his. I told my friend it didn't seem like the pro player's elevator goes all the way to the top and he asked me if I had ever had a conversation with him. I said no, I was just basing my comments on interviews I've seen. My buddy said, "Well let me put it this way...it's a good thing he's a great player because he doesn't have the capacity do anything else."
It just got me wondering what others would choose if you were able to. What do you think?
What if all you ever wanted to do was yodel, but you were born with an innate gift for cross stitch? Not only that, you weren't good at anything else. You don't like to cross stitch but you're great at it...one of the best. You're an artist with your needle and thread and you're getting by but cross stitch competitions and teaching others to cross stitch really doesn't do it for you. Do you continue doing, and disliking, what you're great at? Or do you live a life of mediocrity as a horrible, but happy, yodeler? :wink:
...good at a lot of things or great at only one thing? Here is the catch...if you choose the latter, you have no control over what you're great at. You might not like it.
The reason I ask is I was having a conversation with a friend about a well known pro player buddy of his. I told my friend it didn't seem like the pro player's elevator goes all the way to the top and he asked me if I had ever had a conversation with him. I said no, I was just basing my comments on interviews I've seen. My buddy said, "Well let me put it this way...it's a good thing he's a great player because he doesn't have the capacity do anything else."
It just got me wondering what others would choose if you were able to. What do you think?