He mentions the rules are fundamentally the same. Insinuates @Bob Jewett had some influence in their writing.
I can't find a link to the rules or any press releases. Anyone have any information on this development?
I would reckon Predator 1p and bank pool showdown events might have worked as a proof of concept for upcoming WPA World Championships. I sincerely hope so.I wonder if this will set the stage for having WPA sanctioned World Championships in these two disciplines.
I think it is more to do with great success of the Derby City 1-pocket and Buffalo Billiards 1-pocket events, but either way, interest in the game is growing.I would reckon Predator 1p and bank pool showdown events might have worked as a proof of concept for upcoming WPA World Championships. I sincerely hope so.
Is this just the addition of those games or are any existing rules being revised?The new rules should be available shortly as a PDF on the WPA website.
One pocket is a great game. But I do worry about the WPA getting involved. It is a game that tests a huge variety of skills but, in Fatboy’s terminology, the milk drinkers can stick with WPA snoozefest 10 ball.I think it is more to do with great success of the Derby City 1-pocket and Buffalo Billiards 1-pocket events, but either way, interest in the game is growing.
One-pocket was once almost exclusively American, but about 25 years ago, a couple of pretty sporty Filipino players named Reyes and Bustamante fell in love with the game and both helped raise the general level of play. It seems now that the two most elite European-born players, Gorst and Filler, have fallen in love with the game, too, and it has ushered in yet another chapter in the game's history.
These are good times for one-pocket.
Doing that rule out the gate seems a little aggressive.
It’s about time they started using Grady Rules.
I suppose that if a sponsor could be found that would guarantee the minimum prize money for several years, there could be a WPA-sanctioned World Championship. The current minimum prize money required for a World Championship is $220,001. This is the sum of entry fees and added money, and the amount of added money and the entry fees are negotiated with the WPA.I wonder if this will set the stage for having WPA sanctioned World Championships in these two disciplines.
There were some other revisions. One of the major ones is that the player may use his body and cue as he sees fit to aim, measure, and plan shots. It is no longer a foul to let go of your cue stick while planning the shot. (CSI deleted this as a foul a long time ago.)Is this just the addition of those games or are any existing rules being revised?
My way you can figure in ball totals as major advancement criteria.how can you have a time limit on a match without a shot clock for every shot. otherwise a guy winning will just stall and run the clock out and take the win.
dont some remember the ncaa championships without a shot clock and combined scores were less than 15 points. with winning team just holding the ball.
Chess clock -- you can only waste your own time.how can you have a time limit on a match without a shot clock for every shot. otherwise a guy winning will just stall and run the clock out and take the win.
...
Doing that rule out the gate seems a little aggressive.
Agreed for the most part, but the WPA may now be in a position to sanction a World 1-pocket championship, and that, to me, is an exciting prospect.One pocket is a great game. But I do worry about the WPA getting involved. It is a game that tests a huge variety of skills but, in Fatboy’s terminology, the milk drinkers can stick with WPA snoozefest 10 ball.
Gimme the Buffalo’s stream.