Trying to be neutral here, but I don't think you proved anything really. Just because he says what packaging you might have used does not prove that he has the package. I believe the was assuming that you used his old packaging because he claims that you switched cues and "returned" the cue to him to avoid paying the postal expense. What's interesting is that you did not refute that.
As for him saying you delivered it on the 18th vs the 23rd. He probably assumed you delivered it around that time since the tracking says item delivered on the 18th. What that actually meant that his cue was delivered to you, not that you sent the package to him. So the tracking that you gave him is actually his tracking to you, with the Kikel being "returned" to him. Confusing I know, that probably confused him. It confused me for a bit.
Also, he actually did claim to not receive the cue. It's right after him accusing you of using his packaging.
I also think that he wasn't trying to be mean and bring your wife into this. He only mentioned her because maybe that was the name on the package.
He should have pm'ed and posted. Maybe you saw the post, maybe you didn't, but he should have done both.
What's funny is this:
"....this is not right and every body at AZ`s need to know what happen. Otherwise, guy`s like him will keep doing that for ever without getting in trouble."
Now I see that you got your itrader all good now and he's all red.
But all this is just a theory, I could be completely wrong. Ok time for me to get a life.
As for him saying you delivered it on the 18th vs the 23rd. He probably assumed you delivered it around that time since the tracking says item delivered on the 18th. What that actually meant that his cue was delivered to you, not that you sent the package to him. So the tracking that you gave him is actually his tracking to you, with the Kikel being "returned" to him. Confusing I know, that probably confused him. It confused me for a bit.
Also, he actually did claim to not receive the cue. It's right after him accusing you of using his packaging.
I also think that he wasn't trying to be mean and bring your wife into this. He only mentioned her because maybe that was the name on the package.
He should have pm'ed and posted. Maybe you saw the post, maybe you didn't, but he should have done both.
What's funny is this:
"....this is not right and every body at AZ`s need to know what happen. Otherwise, guy`s like him will keep doing that for ever without getting in trouble."
Now I see that you got your itrader all good now and he's all red.
But all this is just a theory, I could be completely wrong. Ok time for me to get a life.