Xbreaker Being Sold On Ebay

you got it, they capitalize.

there would be more to differ, but try it out and let us now!

i for one would not.
 
Jump all over it!!

Jump all over it! It would be a great way to kick Richard while he is down if it was real.

Let's see, we have a seller with zero feedback. We have one shill bid to start the bidding from someone who has made exactly one bid on e-bay.

fishing, fishing, in the fishing hole. When days are hot, when days are cold, fishing, fishing, in the fishing hole.

Hu






justnick said:
Well I guess with Richard no longer able to promote or sell his cue it left the door open for someone else to capitalize on his reputation and and product

The only difference I see is the tip and no name on the cue



http://cgi.ebay.com/JUMP-BREAK-1st-...ryZ21212QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


By the way I'm not the seller
 
olauzon said:
you got it, they capitalize.

there would be more to differ, but try it out and let us now!

i for one would not.

Sorry I have no intention of buying it or trying it
..
 
Is there a way you can "virtually" puke on an ebay sellers page?

Just curious.
 
Half the point of an X-Breaker is the tip. These use different tips.

And, it's in extremely poor taste to rip off someone elses brand name.
 
These are cheap copies - they are not X-Breakers - not made to Richard's specs - a complete ripoff. I am issuing a takedown email to Ebay to try and stop this fraud.
 
To any one reading this thread and considering one of these cues - they are copies of the X-breaker - this is a blatant ripoff of Richard Chan's brand name and style BUT these cues ARE NOT the same quality or construction or even authorized construction of the creator of the X-breaker.

The seller is the lowest of thieves to promote and sell such a blatant ripoff while Richard is battling cancer and cannot defend himself.

Matt, I hope I run into you someday so that I can hit you as hard as I possibly can - you are a vile fraction of a human being.

I hope I have been clear.
 
Anyone can report this auction as a counterfeiting violation - just go to the bottom of the auction page and click on the "report this item" link.

You will be taken to a dialog which allows you to choose how this item is fraudulently listed.

http://cgi1.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ReportThisItemRedirect&itemid=250150883580&seller=matt9ball2007&active=1

This link may work to take you directly there. Come on AZ don't let this guy kick Richard when he is down. Make him state clearly that his cues are knockoffs and then he can see what they are really worth.
 
didnt matt say he wasnt selling them?

He said he had a "mate" who had them for sale.....

This, after the problems with chan have been brought to light..

JB you might have to pass your shot at him if we all are ever in the same room... I am pretty sure I hit a little harder than you.....
 
John Barton said:
To any one reading this thread and considering one of these cues - they are copies of the X-breaker - this is a blatant ripoff of Richard Chan's brand name and style BUT these cues ARE NOT the same quality or construction or even authorized construction of the creator of the X-breaker.

The seller is the lowest of thieves to promote and sell such a blatant ripoff while Richard is battling cancer and cannot defend himself.

Matt, I hope I run into you someday so that I can hit you as hard as I possibly can - you are a vile fraction of a human being.

I hope I have been clear.
How do you know this for sure, John? You should know better than this. These are probably EXACTLY what they say they are. Richard had these cues made offshore when they first came out. Most mass production companies you hire to build something either build you a run of a certain number, or are hired for a duration of time. A lot of companies are left on the short end of the stick when they get stuck holding product when someone moves to a different supplier. I'm not saying anything bad about Richard. He has the right to move to a different supplier if he gets a sweetheart deal, or likes production quality better from that new supplier. Don't label these as crap, when you have no clue about the cues. These are probably leftovers, or the company that originally made the X-b for Richard now has the right to produce that particular design.

One of the worst kept secrets in the pool industry was the fact that Falcon made all of Predator's cues for them, with the exception of the P2. In Canada, we recognized this and bought Falcons, and then stuck a 314 or a Z on them. Guess what - the shafts matched perfectly. However, in the US, there's always been this label of "cheap Taiwanese cue" when Falcon comes up. The Falcon line was made in Canada, but the parent company, KPS, is in Taiwan. Now, the Preds are offshored in China, by either Ham Sung or TaiCan (I don't know which one with 100% certainty), and yet no one questions the quality of Predator products. I find this statement very hypocritical, John, as you are the man talking about the quality of Chinese products. Now, because you somehow see it as "ripping Richard off", they're cheap? It's called business. People copy products all the time. I see nothing original with the Fury J/B. It looks like a Sledge with a leather wrap. We should be up in arms. You're in favour of me finding a cheaper case than your $1250 model with the same quality, so that the customer can save money and get quality? Look no further. An X-breaker for $210. They may be legit. You used to be able to buy them directly from China on eBay - TaiCan Billiards was selling them through one of their distributors. They had first and second gen Xs at prices less than $150US.

Just my opinion, John. I'll expect your response, calling me an idiot, anytime soon.
 
justnick said:
Well I guess with Richard no longer able to promote or sell his cue it left the door open for someone else to capitalize on his reputation and and product

The only difference I see is the tip and no name on the cue



http://cgi.ebay.com/JUMP-BREAK-1st-...ryZ21212QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem


By the way I'm not the seller
Save yourself some money. Buy them from the manufacturer/distributor in Asia:
http://cgi.ebay.com.hk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250145288088&ih=015&category=44077

I've seen these around for a long time, long before Richard's health problems became public. Sounds like they're the "old" manufacturer of the X-breaker, before Richard went to Samsara (and their asian production house).
 
You wouldn't understand Shawn. It doesn't surprise me in the least that you support intellectual property theft.

I am not going to go into the whole deal again - the guy is ripping off Richard Chan period - he is a scummy person and so is anyone who supports him.

In the second auction you listed this is NOT the manufacturer but they are the same cues AND if you can't see the difference in the two auctions then I can't hep you either with your comprehension or yoru morality.

Not only is Matt stealig Richard's intellectual property he is also stealing the content for his auction from the guy in Hong Kong.

And I know that you want to make this about me Shawn because I beat you at every turn. Go back and reread carefully what I wrote about the cases you listed and see if you can understand anything I said about people who create and people who use things created by other people. You can then tell us which group you and Matt fit into.
 
You see Shawn you don't know anything with certainty but you certainly like to spout off like you do.

It's not Ham Sung Mr. Racism, it's Hamson and Hamson is Taican. You can't go directly to the factory for a cue made by them unless you are a distributor. And golly gee aren't you the resourceful one to find out what is common knowledge? I am sure that you know the history of every cue, case, tip, table, ball, and well gee, just everything.

Well folks there you have it, Shawn Armstrong is your clearing house for Pool Products. Mike, can we get a Board called "Get Shawn's Approval" so that anyone considering a product purchase can find out if it's ok? J

Since Shawn knows all - we should now defer to him in all matters involving rules, products, the right way to play, how to chalk, morality, ethics, and well.....everything.
 
John Barton said:
You wouldn't understand Shawn. It doesn't surprise me in the least that you support intellectual property theft.

I am not going to go into the whole deal again - the guy is ripping off Richard Chan period - he is a scummy person and so is anyone who supports him.

In the second auction you listed this is NOT the manufacturer but they are the same cues AND if you can't see the difference in the two auctions then I can't hep you either with your comprehension or yoru morality.

Not only is Matt stealig Richard's intellectual property he is also stealing the content for his auction from the guy in Hong Kong.

And I know that you want to make this about me Shawn because I beat you at every turn. Go back and reread carefully what I wrote about the cases you listed and see if you can understand anything I said about people who create and people who use things created by other people. You can then tell us which group you and Matt fit into.
John, if you want to talk about intellectual property, Richard "borrowed" the dimpled tip on the new design from the Falcon TNT break cue. I was the guy that came up with the dimple, so if anyone should be pissed about intellectual property being stolen, I should go see Richard about taking my design from the break cue I made for Jim Wych and Jeff White.

The cue is clearly made by the same factory that made the originals. Just like the original Instroke cases you had made in China, or wherever you had them made. One line went out with a name plate, the others didn't. It doesn't mean that they aren't the same quality. The golf industry has had to live with cloning for decades now. Suck it up. It's wood, phenolic, and metal parts put together. Also, does Richard have a patent on the X-breaker? Also, seeing as he's no longer able to sell the rproduct due to his health problems (which I am not making light of), should there be a void in the industry for this product? He makes a cue with a G10 tip. Guys put these things on cues all the time. You're the one advocating for better products at better prices to the consumer. I had a friend that used to be in the laptop industry. The company he worked for was contracted to make laptops for Dell, Toshiba and a few other lower end names. Their company had one year contracts with the "parent" companies to make their machines for them. At the end of the year, the actual manufacturer was able to "clone" the models they made for the big names, except with their own badging on it. That's capitalism for you. Who knows, maybe this company had the same sort of contract with him.

I realize a few people are emotional about Richard right now. Friends is friends. Business is business. Don't go calling someone a ripoff artist without knowing the story. McDermott now makes the Sledgehammer J/B cue. They didn't "rip off" Gulyassy. They had a contract in place. I've seen both cues (the original X and the asian version from eBay) close up. You could take the butt off the 1st Gen X and stick it on the "cheap" knock-off with identical fit and finish. That, to me, smells like it came off the same line.
 
Shawn Armstrong said:
Also, seeing as he's no longer able to sell the rproduct due to his health problems (which I am not making light of), should there be a void in the industry for this product?

Ugh. Are you basically saying it's all right to prey on the ill?

Just because Richard is sick doesn't mean any intellectual property he owns is up for grabs. Geez.
 
Shawn Armstrong said:
How do you know this for sure, John?

I am a little more "in" the business than you know.

You should know better than this.

Actually you should know better as evidenced by your words below.

These are probably EXACTLY what they say they are. Richard had these cues made offshore when they first came out. Most mass production companies you hire to build something either build you a run of a certain number, or are hired for a duration of time. A lot of companies are left on the short end of the stick when they get stuck holding product when someone moves to a different supplier.

Even IF what you say is true, which it is not. Neither Taican or any other OEM manufacturer has the right to sell the products under the same or otehr names that they are contracted to produce. It's called theft. Once again you let theory and fantasy obscure reality so you can seem as if you know something.

I'm not saying anything bad about Richard. He has the right to move to a different supplier if he gets a sweetheart deal, or likes production quality better from that new supplier. Don't label these as crap, when you have no clue about the cues.

How do you know I have "no clue"? Do you know where I have been and who I deal with? No you don't.

These are probably leftovers, or the company that originally made the X-b for Richard now has the right to produce that particular design.

Ah yes they are PROBABLY leftovers, they MIGHT be this, or MAYBE this happened. And what gives them "the right" to produce these cues or sell "the leftovers"? Surely in your fourth grade business textbook you can find where customers of OEM's routinely make contracts with manufacturers that grants then the right to sell production overruns or gosh even keep producing the product after the contract ends. Please show us where this is standard business practice.

One of the worst kept secrets in the pool industry was the fact that Falcon made all of Predator's cues for them, with the exception of the P2. In Canada, we recognized this and bought Falcons, and then stuck a 314 or a Z on them. Guess what - the shafts matched perfectly. However, in the US, there's always been this label of "cheap Taiwanese cue" when Falcon comes up.

Actually that is not a secret nor is it a label that is/was generally applied to Falcon cues. But you know all so I must be wrong. There were rumors that got started about Falcon getting most of the productions done in Taiwan and doing the finishing in Canada but those were mostly debunked.


The Falcon line was made in Canada, but the parent company, KPS, is in Taiwan. Now, the Preds are offshored in China, by either Ham Sung or TaiCan (I don't know which one with 100% certainty), and yet no one questions the quality of Predator products.

In fact, the quality of Predator products now that they are known to be 100% made in China is in question. It should not be as Predator will maintain strict quality control and insure that only products that meet their standards will reach their consumers. That is UNLESS the factory decides to start selling "overruns" and "unbranded" Predators where Predator makes no money and has no control over the product. But that would be okay right because it's just "business"?


I find this statement very hypocritical, John, as you are the man talking about the quality of Chinese products. Now, because you somehow see it as "ripping Richard off", they're cheap? It's called business. People copy products all the time.

Yep people copy all the time and it's okay because it's just business. It's no surprise to me that you feel this way as you have no ethics.

I see nothing original with the Fury J/B. It looks like a Sledge with a leather wrap. We should be up in arms.

Talk to Kaz Miki, he designed the Fury JB. There is big difference however in "looks like","is similar to" and "this is Brand X, without a logo".


You're in favour of me finding a cheaper case than your $1250 model with the same quality, so that the customer can save money and get quality?

No I said find or make a case with the same level of decoration for a lower price. I didn't say anything about the quality of the construction.


Look no further. An X-breaker for $210. They may be legit. You used to be able to buy them directly from China on eBay - TaiCan Billiards was selling them through one of their distributors. They had first and second gen Xs at prices less than $150US.

One again, they MAY be "legit". That's funny that you use that word Shawn. Just the other day I heard someone say that they never heard an honest man use the word legit. It struck a chord with me and the church bells are ringing as you utter it. Let me clue you in - IF the OWNER of the INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY does not AUTHORIZE them then they are not "legit" despite ANY claims of the seller. The consumer is being ripped off because they have no way to insure that they are getting the product advertised, and the brand holder is being ripped off. Even if the OEM is making these cues the consumer has NO WAY to know that they are made to the standards Richard set for them, PROBABLY NOT, they have no recourse for a REFUND or ANY KIND OF HELP should something go wrong.

But you already know that.

Just my opinion, John. I'll expect your response, calling me an idiot, anytime soon.

Now Shawn, why would I need to state the obvious? Don't you know the quote, "better to be thought an idiot than to open your mouth and prove it."
 
ScottW said:
Ugh. Are you basically saying it's all right to prey on the ill?

Just because Richard is sick doesn't mean any intellectual property he owns is up for grabs. Geez.
These guys on eBay were selling these cues long before Richard announced his illness. They're not being opportunistic. I've seen these cues on the Asian eBay for at least 4-6 months now. Actually around the same time that Richard changed manufacturers.
 
There is nothing to "suck up" Shawn. Theft is theft whether it's commonplace or not. If Richard stole from you then that's wrong but it doesn't make it RIGHT for the factory or anyone else to steal from him.

You are despicable. I know that you are on the other end of this on your keyboard convinced that you are "right" and obsessed with proving me wrong. Right now you are neglecting your family to promote your brand of ethics, from jump cues to theft. Your view is wrong and you are a horrible human being. I don't even care to banter "witty" insults with you anymore.

You can say whatever you like from here on out because your own words do more damage to yourself than anything I could ever say.
 
Back
Top