If it were easy, it wouldn't be fun.Patrick Johnson said:And all we have to do is hit a 1/16" target (and control where the CB goes afterward). This game is too easy.
If it were easy, it wouldn't be fun.Patrick Johnson said:And all we have to do is hit a 1/16" target (and control where the CB goes afterward). This game is too easy.
dr_dave said:If it were easy, it wouldn't be fun.
Actually, we sometimes don't sink the ball, especially if CIT is not accounted for, and/or if "skid" (AKA "cling" or "excessive throw") occurs.pooltchr said:Dave, you forgot to account for CIT.![]()
And what about cue ball skid?
It's amazing that any of us can ever actually sink a ball!![]()
With outside English (OE), the throw can be in the CIT direction (for OE less than the "gearing" amount), in the SIT direction (for OE more than the "gearing" amount), or zero (for "gearing" OE). For lots of info on this topic, see the answer to the 2nd question here:pooltchr said:Actually, I believe CIT is far more significant than SIT. It is possible in some instances for one to offset the other, but my experience (undocumented) has been that CIT always has to be taken into consideration on any cut shot.
dr_dave said:With outside English (OE), the throw can be in the CIT direction (for OE less than the "gearing" amount), in the SIT direction (for OE more than the "gearing" amount), or zero (for "gearing" OE). For lots of info on this topic, see the answer to the 2nd question here:
I have links to many resources illustrating and explaining all of the different cases and when they apply. Even with an extremely thin cut, the OB can be thrown in the SIT direction with OE. I'm not saying you should do this ... just that it is possible. With small cut angle shots, it is very easy to throw the OB in the SIT direction.
Regards,
Dave