peterskw said:

WTB I'm looking for a couple high quality 1x2 cases.
Thanks,
Ken

Click to expand...

I have several new or pristine GTF and Sam Engles 1x2 cases

iusedtoberich said:

... There must have been 30 or more pros his same speed in pool history and none acted like him. ...

Click to expand...

I've heard that Gene Nagy took a baseball bat to the jukebox. And there was Robert Cannefax who took a pocket knife to the tournament cloth he thought was too old. He also would stab himself in the leg with that knife when he was upset. He had a wooden leg -- I assume he didn't forget which was which.

iusedtoberich said:

Seems kind of bouncy to me, closer to a Diamond than a GC. Hard to say for sure unless on the table. The aesthetics are out of this world good though.

Click to expand...

Looks like it. I just got smoked on a Diamond 7 barbox recently. Played the worst match ever as long as I could remember, not sure how many racks I've won but I played abysmal. It was so bad that I was considering not playing pool again. One of the tightest pockets, really slow cloth and hard rails. My banks are not even working that I only managed 1 successful attempt. I'm never going to play on a barbox competitively ever again. If there was one thing it is good for, is pocketing drills.

Bump

I think in an informal game, a couple of seconds of leave checking is ok. Peering and staring and sighting is not ok. An exception is snooker where you might be required to approve the restored position.

The person in charge of the shot clock should not start it until the misser is away from the table.

jasonlaus said:

I have no problem betting or paying, in fact I have a track record on AZ, do you? Truth be told, I didn't do much paying, usually won

Click to expand...

I don't but I'll put money where my mouth is.
How do we even find matches where male vs female on pro event to bet?

What are your terms? If you need a big spot then it's just prove my saying but I'm reasonable, I know there is ZERO female players out there will play a 800 fargo men even. What are your terms

iusedtoberich said:

I believe it's because the cb will pick up running spin each time it hits a cusion (if they are hit sequentially). So if it starts with it, the extra it picks up won't substantially change the angles. But if no spin or opposite spin is used from the tip, the angles will change substantially when it hits the subsequent rails.

Click to expand...

In that regard, ball speed. Ball being self propelled moves more stably and predictably. Dead ball, everything is on the strike.

Try the corner-five system corner to corner on three different ages of cloth. See how quickly you can make it work with various combinations of left, center, right and follow, draw, stun. I think that experiment is going to be far more convincing than any post here.