dr_dave said:

. That’s part of the learning process

Click to expand...

A study in the line of the cueball after impact with the object ball and how it can be changed by top and bottom should come first in the learning process.
So many beginners want to spin their rock for shape when center axis high and low adjustment can change the path without effecting the line whitey takes from cue tip to object ball.
Perhaps you address this in another video. A link with the caution to walk before run would be appropriate. Side on the cueball is an advanced technique and often the answer. Speed does add another variable that the side inserts. Center axis is a good place to start in learning how to control the path of the cueball after striking the object ball. Side can change the path whitey takes getting to the object ball along with aim point on the object ball and requires further calculation. Not necessarily a slide rule calculation but significant.
Thanks for your advanced studies.

Hi,
these are the specifications

Shaft 1

• Shaft: Original Normal
• Weight: 109.5g
• Length: 736mm
• Ferrule Diameter: 12.1mm
• Ferrule Material: White 25mm
• Shaft Ring: Original Ring
• Joint Diameter: 21.5mm

Shaft 2

• Shaft: Original
• Weight: 113.2g
• Length: 737mm
• Ferrule Diameter: 13.0mm
• Ferrule Material: White 25mm
• Shaft Ring: Original Ring
• Joint Diameter: 21.5mm

For wanything please let me know, if you are interested in the price a discount is applicable

This picture sums up my vision of "normal" aiming systems vs "string theory" (CTE) aiming.


I lost count....how many new string theory books have been published? Genius though to latch on to something that needs endless revisions to sell suckers new books......but to come out and say you invented it and are the only authorized snake oil salesman....that is laughable and probably has HH turning over in his grave as all if his sharing of (many) different methods of aiming were never "sold" to anyone. They were shared with anyone that would listen.....and were never once (through my personal conversations with him) told to be the holy grail of aiming......His words to me were.....if the method works...use it...if a different method works use that one....everyone sees different and will grasp a method that fits them.

Sure....string theory can be applied as a tool in specific shot situations....but not even close to the holy grail of aiming.

My link to the Ultimate Aiming System below sums up what I think of most of the elaborate aiming systems

This vid has been on my YT home page for a few days but I have not had time to watch.
Is it worth the time?

O happy day!