Turning Stone

I picked a match at random to watch before, during and after dinner just for something to do. It was Ed Culhane and Dwight Dixon. While it was on I looked up what I could find out about each - made it a little more interesting. Culhane was really inconsistent, Dixon pretty much handled the match easily. I just enjoyed watching players for a bit that are a lot more relatable to how I play (but I don't compete, not in the arena, so to speak) and "seeing" things I through they were seeing, understanding how things went wrong and from Culhane's side of things, surprised how often he seemed to be hitting balls too hard and how off his position play was and probably just off in general that particular match - not criticizing, just observing and no doubt either would own my house shortly after I invited them to dinner if we went downstairs after and played, haha.

Totally different, but I watching one of those vids of APA finals from some random year and all levels of players, but man, some of the ones with higher numbers would have had a tough time winning in the bars we played at in my youthful university days. Just an observation, maybe watching those for some who don't have a lot of confidence in their games or don't know how they "stack up" would be a good way to see where they fit. Looked like a lot of fun, though, and that should be the point of it. Know someone who plays a lot of APA around here and he really enjoys it - I'm too old to be hanging around bars playing pool on the one crappy coin operated table with much younger folks - that ship sailed about the time I got married and sunk when we had kids. But if leagues had been more of a thing when I was in college, I'd have been all in --only issue is I used to buy a pack of Camel straights to enjoy when playing pool -- stupid, but loved the purple haze -- one thing I'm glad I gave up 30+ years ago.

Predicting and Controlling Cue Ball Direction off a Rail with Follow Shots

. That’s part of the learning process
A study in the line of the cueball after impact with the object ball and how it can be changed by top and bottom should come first in the learning process.
So many beginners want to spin their rock for shape when center axis high and low adjustment can change the path without effecting the line whitey takes from cue tip to object ball.
Perhaps you address this in another video. A link with the caution to walk before run would be appropriate. Side on the cueball is an advanced technique and often the answer. Speed does add another variable that the side inserts. Center axis is a good place to start in learning how to control the path of the cueball after striking the object ball. Side can change the path whitey takes getting to the object ball along with aim point on the object ball and requires further calculation. Not necessarily a slide rule calculation but significant.
Thanks for your advanced studies.

✦ Diveney Custom Cue (2010)

Hi,
these are the specifications

Shaft 1

  • Shaft: Original Normal
  • Weight: 109.5g
  • Length: 736mm
  • Ferrule Diameter: 12.1mm
  • Ferrule Material: White 25mm
  • Shaft Ring: Original Ring
  • Joint Diameter: 21.5mm

Shaft 2

  • Shaft: Original
  • Weight: 113.2g
  • Length: 737mm
  • Ferrule Diameter: 13.0mm
  • Ferrule Material: White 25mm
  • Shaft Ring: Original Ring
  • Joint Diameter: 21.5mm
For wanything please let me know, if you are interested in the price a discount is applicable

Cte finally explained?

This picture sums up my vision of "normal" aiming systems vs "string theory" (CTE) aiming.
direct.webp


I lost count....how many new string theory books have been published? Genius though to latch on to something that needs endless revisions to sell suckers new books......but to come out and say you invented it and are the only authorized snake oil salesman....that is laughable and probably has HH turning over in his grave as all if his sharing of (many) different methods of aiming were never "sold" to anyone. They were shared with anyone that would listen.....and were never once (through my personal conversations with him) told to be the holy grail of aiming......His words to me were.....if the method works...use it...if a different method works use that one....everyone sees different and will grasp a method that fits them.

Sure....string theory can be applied as a tool in specific shot situations....but not even close to the holy grail of aiming.

My link to the Ultimate Aiming System below sums up what I think of most of the elaborate aiming systems:p

Filter

Back
Top