Beware_of_Dawg said:page cannot be displayed.
I had the same problem and clicked "Try Again" and several minutes later it finally completed loading.
Steve
Beware_of_Dawg said:page cannot be displayed.
sde said:You can click on the link in this post. It loads VERY slow and is not the easiest to read, but I found the wait to be worth while.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=994730&postcount=74
Steve
SCCues said:And don't forget the sandbagging factor, which is something they'll never be able to stop. It's so bad where I live that it takes all of the fun out of playing in the APA.......
James
kmg said:to avoid some of the speculation and questions that arised with the APA. We are also taking all of the fees from the weekly dues and greensfees and creating cash prizes for the winning teams.
The computerized handicapping is based on the APA system but not identical. The computer program was written for our room and we openly discuss the handicaps with all the players - no secrecy!
Our players will win a lot more money and can pay their own way to Vegas!
www.RockawayBilliards.com
Rockaway, New Jersey
Players who want to sand bag may shoot a couple of shots perfectly and then obviously miss an easy shot to let their opponent shoot or run a rack down the the last ball or two and then miss on purpose or win a few games where they will win the match if they win another game and just start missing critical shots or actually miss and play position for their opponent or scratch on purpose to give their opponent ball in hand, the list goes on and on as far as things a player can do to sandbag and lose on purpose to keep their handicap down.tigerseye said:Just wanting to know exactly the procedure to sandbag in this kinda format....just so i will know what to look for in upcoming league matches...thanks![]()
sde said:We have something similar here as well.
The GGRPL is a local independent FUN league with about 30 or so teams.
There is an annual $35 tavern, $12 annual player sanction fee and costs $2 a week to play.
All money (after expenses) goes toward trophies, year end banquet and many many door prizes. The LO is paid for expenses and a very small amount for his time (after years of doing it for free).
It based on the APA with several changes. The most notable are:
Call ball and pocket.
No 23 rule.
Safeties DO COUNT as innings.
All matches are played the the full SL, not minus 1 or 2 in the case of a 7.
A player is not penalized for winning because the opponent scratches on the 8, 8 in wrong pocket etc. (unless the APA has recently made a change).
League rules and rule changes are voted on at the captains meetings before each session!
The league is split into 3 divisions determined by the quality of the teams and how they place in the preceding session.
What I like best about this league is the no 23 rule which allows you to put a team of friends together without the fear of having to drop a player because his SL went up. Having grown up in a pool room I do not know many low level players so my team consists of 2 SL4, 1 SL5 and 4 SL7. I am the captain and weakest player on the team at SL4. The other SL4 is a new player and not yet reached his final SL.![]()
Steve
sde said:You can click on the link in this post. It loads VERY slow and is not the easiest to read, but I found the wait to be worth while.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpost.php?p=994730&postcount=74
Steve
Gregg said:It also shows how important winning is in relationship to your SL.
It also shows (clearly) how it's almost impossible to drop a SL without losing.
Beware_of_Dawg said:Actually if Im not mistaken, I think losing has very little to do with dropping SL's. They use your winning scores to evaluate your SL. So, technically the best way to drop SL's is to win but rack up a ton of innings.
Beware_of_Dawg said:Actually if Im not mistaken, I think losing has very little to do with dropping SL's. They use your winning scores to evaluate your SL. So, technically the best way to drop SL's is to win but rack up a ton of innings.
SCCues said:Players who want to sand bag may shoot a couple of shots perfectly and then obviously miss an easy shot to let their opponent shoot or run a rack down the the last ball or two and then miss on purpose or win a few games where they will win the match if they win another game and just start missing critical shots or actually miss and play position for their opponent or scratch on purpose to give their opponent ball in hand, the list goes on and on as far as things a player can do to sandbag and lose on purpose to keep their handicap down.
I've seen players with a handicap of 4 which should be 6 or 7 play 2 and 3 handicap players and run racks and then they suddenly shoot a ball into the rail so the 2 or 3 can shoot and start running up the innings in the match. The sand bagger actually laughs about it and it just ruins the handicap system. Players have learned the system and they know what to do to keep their handicap down until they get to a critical match like playing for a trip to Las Vegas against a team that has the correct handicaps. The sand baggers eat them alive and all you can do is complain to the LO and he or she thinks you are a sore loser and does nothing about it.
James
soulcatcher said:Not true at all. You will never go down if you have a 50% or higher win rate. Innings do not matter if you win, and you are over the "applied" inning score for your win %. If you go to the link posted earlier it gives the way applied scores are calculated. Also, they take your best 10 scores out of your last 20 matches, not only your wins.
There are also lowest attainable skills and national skill levels.
National: If you go to the nationals for singles or teams, you can never be lower than your rating when you leave Vegas. If you go as a 3 and they bump you to a 4, you can never go below a 4 again without league operator and APA Head office agreement. But if you go as a 4, and drop to a 3 while in Vegas, you can be no lower than a 3 after Vegas. I went to Vegas as a 6, lost my first match and dropped to a 5, won my next match and went back to a 6. I ended a 6, so now I can never be below a 6.
Lowest Attainable: If you are a 5, move to a 6, then stay a 6 for 10 matches, you can never go lower than a 5 after that.
soulcatcher said:Not true at all. You will never go down if you have a 50% or higher win rate. Innings do not matter if you win, and you are over the "applied" inning score for your win %. If you go to the link posted earlier it gives the way applied scores are calculated. Also, they take your best 10 scores out of your last 20 matches, not only your wins.
There are also lowest attainable skills and national skill levels.
National: If you go to the nationals for singles or teams, you can never be lower than your rating when you leave Vegas. If you go as a 3 and they bump you to a 4, you can never go below a 4 again without league operator and APA Head office agreement. But if you go as a 4, and drop to a 3 while in Vegas, you can be no lower than a 3 after Vegas. I went to Vegas as a 6, lost my first match and dropped to a 5, won my next match and went back to a 6. I ended a 6, so now I can never be below a 6.
Lowest Attainable: If you are a 5, move to a 6, then stay a 6 for 10 matches, you can never go lower than a 5 after that.
Beware_of_Dawg said:Now, the diocument I saw seemed to be for 8ball... Is 9ball the same?
rope_one said:You can click on the link in this post. It loads VERY slow and is not the easiest to read, but I found the wait to be worth while.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showpo...0&postcount=74
Steve
__________________
I am suprised my link didn't create more of discussion last time. I found this to be fairly interesting reading. I know it is dated and all, but I would imagine its still fairly accurate. Although if people were willing to properly mark defensive shots, sand bagging would naturally go away in their system. Perhaps not guarding this information of how it is calculated so closely would make people more vigilant in marking defense? That could be worth more to them than small leagues using their formula, I would think.