I'll point out spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors for a couple of reasons .... sometimes for humour and sometimes to take a poke at someone.
Dave <-- obtuse and truculent, often at the same time
I used to just correct the quoted posts that I was quoting, but nobody seemed to notice when I did that, so I quit doing it. It was really more for my benefit than theirs anyway.
I correct my daughter's notes to me all the time. She used to have this thing about commas, not placing them in the correct place within the sentence structure. I'm also a strong advocate for serial commas, unlike the AP style that is used in most academic settings today. :angry:
I work on three computers at my workstation. My main desktop, I have my trusty keyboard, which I can fly on at 150-plus words per minute. :wink:
I hate typing on my laptop keyboard, and I stumble when I do. My other desktop has a sticky keyboard on it, and when I'm on that computer, I stumble. Some people may have fat digits which prohibits their typing capabilities.
I have a couple dozen keyboards in my office right now. Did you ever notice how keyboards today have different key configurations? Some have big Backspace keys, and others have small Backspace keys. The Insert, Home, Page Up, Delete, End, and Page Down keys also seem to have different placements on keyboards these days.
Some folks may make a mistake because of keyboard compatibilities; others may not realize they are not spelling a word correctly and don't care.
Here's a cool article about keyboard ratings: Eight Best Keyboards.
I've got my eye on the Optimus Maximum model which costs $1,600. Heck, they got keyboards that warm you fingers, and there's keyboards that light up the letters. There's egonomic keyboards, and there's even rubber keyboards. Keyboard makes a big different when banging posts.
I will usually correct someone's spelling if it someone's name, like Mike Sigel and not Mike Seegal or Mike Siegal or Mike Segel, as an example.
In my industry, if you spell a person's name wrong, that seems to be the only thing that people care about, if their name is not spelled correctly. :grin-square:
Anyone care for a game of Scrabble?![]()
Joey:
Like you, part of what I do in that "day job thing" involves lots of writing (technical publications, proofing, Request for Comments [RFCs], Request for Proposals [RFPs], Statements of Work [SOWs], customer-facing deliverables [findings from an ethical hacking / vulnerability assessment / perimeter penetration test], etc.)
The answer lie in the original poster you're quoting -- is he/she the same type of person that you and I are, in that you don't mind if someone innocuously corrects typos in the post they're quoting? Or even like me -- if I outright misspelled something, or committed a grand grammar faux pas that someone like me should know not to do but I had a brain fart, I don't mind someone saying "Hey Sean, did you perhaps mean 'whose' here, instead of 'who's'?" (Doing it as a postscript, of course, and not the sole "meat" of the reply -- because that's obvious spelling/grammar police.)
Me personally? I like to quote the original post, warts and all, and not touch anything in it. Then, what I'll do is editorialize a bit, repeating parts of the original poster's question, but "silently" spelling the words correctly without overtly pointing the typos out. This way, it's subtle -- if the person *cares* about his/her appearance on these boards, and wants to always put his/her best foot forward, believe-you-me, they'll notice the subtle hints and make adjustments. If they're the type of person like you and me, the corrected words in your reply (as compared to the post you quoted and later editorialized in your reply) will jump out at them. If they're NOT the type of person who cares about his/her appearance on these boards, they won't notice, and that's also a good thing -- because no matter how you do it overtly, correction of spelling/grammar will always be viewed as pedantic. "You understood what I was trying to say, right? Then why are you correcting my spelling and grammar? That's not why I'm here -- are you?" will be the reply.
The other option is PM/offline communiques. Ask yourself, do you *really* have to point out their typos in the open? The fact that you yourself don't like it when the grammar police overtly point something out -- and I mean they openly tell you they corrected something -- should say something about how others might portray the same effort.
Anyway, that's my thoughts from a fellow veteran who'd learned through the school of hard-knocks when, and when not to, engage in these types of battles. For those that take it the right way -- constructively -- it's worth it. But those folks are few and far between.
Hope this is helpful!
-Sean
Shouldn't that begin with, "We all make spelling errors."? Or, better yet, "We all commit spelling errors."?
Sorry, I couldn't resist.![]()
Spelling doesn't matter, as long as it's possible to get the meaning intended. Fixing a quote is...sticking your thumb in the original poster's eye. If it was good enough for him to write, then it's good enough for you to quote.
btw, I use the Google Chrome browser, and it automatically spell checks--and apparently has a huge dictionary, too: only very rarely does it incorrectly flag a word that's actually correct.
As I look at this post now, only the "btw" has a wavy red underline.
You mean something like this?
Sometimes I cut and paste to MS Word and compose my post with spell and grammar check that is in there before I paste back into AZB Forums.
Mostly, I don't care and I don't.
There are fewer spelling Nazis as of late....where's hondo?:wink::thumbup:
There is a strong debate about the usage of serial commas in my industry.
Example with serial comma: The flag is red, white, and blue.
Example without serial comma: The flag is red, white and blue.
I am a strong advocate for serial commas.
Another thing they're doing in school these days is instructing their students to only place one space after the ending punctuation mark. I will always, always, always use two spaces, unless I am getting paid by somebody not to. :wink:
This forum's software only allows one space after the period, even though I always type two spaces.
About the ellipsis, that is another bone of contention. I never use an ellipsis or ellipses (plural) unless it is in quoted material.
Example: Lincoln said, "Four score...our fathers brought forth...."
Some people insert an ellipsis at the end of a broken thought, showing a person was trailing off and did not complete their sentence. Bulldingy on that. You use a double hyphen for those instances.
And don't even get me started on the en and em dashes. :grin-square:
I thought Word changed some of the punctuation or added different punctuation marks where they're not wanted (when copied and pasted back into the forum.
Many of those with por spelin, and gramr, are products of under funded pubic edukation systms. People hate payin taxzes , especallie scrol taxrs.
Everybody has their toughies. For me, it's immanent, eminent, and imminent. I have to look up the meaning of those words each and every time. I just cannot remember their meanings and get them mixed up.
On this forum, some common errors are these:
lose/loose
our/are
to/too
rediculous when it should be ridiculous
Texting has hurt our youth today when it comes to using proper spellings. The text champions are always under the age of 12 at the national championships. At a championship held in Arizona, when a 16-year-old came to compete, the other competitors laughed at him for even trying. He didn't have a prayer to win.![]()
In the old days, we used to do math from scratch. Today's youth use calculators. :grin-square:
Perhaps, but anyone who wishes to improve themselves should do so. Blaming ones shortcomings on "under funded public" systems is the easy way out. I think you will find that most learned people become that way through their own efforts.
Dave
Of course, Petey; no offense taken. Yup, if that's the case -- that I care about how I present myself on these forums (remember, a rag-tag mixture of people from all walks of life) -- I'm guilty as charged. I'm a diva.
Now, how many balls did you say I have to spot you in a race to 150?
-Sean
The issue, for me, is why would I correct someone’s grammar, spelling, and punctuation?
In general, I suggest alternatives for those who might be interested. Most people have little interest in such matters. Like many areas of life it is best not to tell all that you know. Most people simply do not care.
Though my daughter, a professor of English, disagrees, I encourage people to write like they talk. This encourages people to write and think in words. Learning to express one’s self ithrough the written word is a formidable task for some and one that should be encouraged, not discouraged with corrections.
Finally, most anything I have written professionally has been through at least two, usually several proofreaders and they often disagree with each other. The time for correction is after I have created my communication and the extent of corrections depends upon the venue where it will be displayed. I would suggest that an internet forum is not the place to worry about the correctness of one’s presentation.
In academia I found that I learned much about students from the quality of their written word. The same evaluations of content are often valuable here as in other areas of life.
BTW -- how many mistakes can you find?
One of the ones that gets to me is "bacote"! I see cuemakers, wood dealers and all sorts of people describing something, most often a cue, as made from "bacote". The correct spelling is "BOCOTE" !
I especially like your perspective that I bold face above. That's a kind, generous, and highly productive perspective.
As to correcting any of your mistakes; I wouldn't dare try.
I hope no one tried to say that you should have capitalized the word Internet.
I'm still reading one post and responding at a time so if I duplicate someone's thoughts, I apologize in advance.