Yet Another CTE Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
With your eyes "straddling the ctel" as your starting position...you move your eyes until the cb inside edge hits a b or c (touches the same vertical line in your field of vision). At that point, the 180 deg view of the cb is what you slide into with your tip offset.

Sent from my SPH-M910 using Tapatalk

THAT makes sense to me. Did Stan even say that in the DVD??? I don't know if he did because I think I would have understood that. So thats what he means by 'lock in the edges'?
 
With your eyes "straddling the ctel" as your starting position...you move your eyes until the cb inside edge hits a b or c (touches the same vertical line in your field of vision). At that point, the 180 deg view of the cb is what you slide into with your tip offset.

Sent from my SPH-M910 using Tapatalk

Does "straddling the CTEL" mean the vision center is alligned with the CTEL? Yes or No?
 
Last edited:
I can tell you are now very interested in learning this system and i can tell you see a lot of potential in it :)
The more I learn about CTE the less I like it as a system for myself. It seems to be Hal Houle's old "3 angles" system (Stan even says it's based on that) with fewer angles and feel's part in it a little more cleverly obscured.

I do like some aspects of it (I'll describe them later), but they're not unique to CTE and I don't think a system that actively obscures reality is the best way to learn them for most players.

pj
chgo
 
If the balls don't move, the CTEL is the same for both shots. If you don't move your head, and sight along the CTEL, how can you see two different cueball edge overlaps on the object ball? You can't! Don't you see there is some information missing here.

I think, perhaps, sighting along the CTEL is being overemphasized. Instead, you sight by feel, somewhere between the CTEL and SL, knowing in advance you need the cueball edge to go to A one time, and knowing it must go to B another time.

the ctel is different on those shots, you are describing! center to right edge, center to left edge, different reference points and pivots!
 
Last edited:
Your kidding ..right!! Set up a CTEL and move 6 inches to the right..Are you telling me you see the same CTEL!!
If you move 6 inches to the right, you can't "see" any CTE line. There's only one (well, two since there are two OB edges).

OMG. :eek:

pj
chgo
 
the ctel is different on those shots, you are describing!

I don't understand! The balls remain in the same position yet you say the CTEL moves. That makes no sense. No one can even pin down where the eyes are supposed to be, yet this is supposed to be an exact aiming system. It's becoming clear that feel is involved even as to the initial eye placement - somewhere between the CTEL and SL. "Straddling the CTEL" is not meaningful, much less exact. Good nite, men!
 
When you sight the cb inside edge to a/b/c, your no longer seeing the "that one edge" on the ob you're referring to. It's impossible. Sometimes I think you act stupid on purpose and ram the devil's advocate position in every thread. Your eyes aren't on the ctel....so you get that, right?

Sent from my SPH-M910 using Tapatalk
pablocruz (you know, the guy I was talking to) said that we can see different CTE lines formed by the same stationary balls. Are you agreeing with him? Or are you acting stupid on purpose?

pj
chgo
 
The more I learn about CTE the less I like it as a system for myself. It seems to be Hal Houle's old "3 angles" system (Stan even says it's based on that) with fewer angles and feel's part in it a little more cleverly obscured.

I do like some aspects of it (I'll describe them later), but they're not unique to CTE and I don't think a system that actively obscures reality is the best way to learn them for most players.

pj
chgo

ok, you disagree with the way he has hidden the feel part of the system, that ok with me. I am not concerned about the feel part or exact part that everyone is making a big deal about. Yes he says in the dvd hal helped him. By what you are posting i do believe you know this has great potential and is not flawed once learned and I think you can bring a lot of positives to this whole cte stuff if you stop with the negatives and go with the positives!
 
I don't understand! The balls remain in the same position yet you say the CTEL moves. That makes no sense. No one can even pin down where the eyes are supposed to be, yet this is supposed to be an exact aiming system. It's becoming clear that feel is involved even as to the initial eye placement - somewhere between the CTEL and SL. "Straddling the CTEL" is not meaningful, much less exact. Good nite, men!

i added but i guess you didnt see it so here it is.

the ctel is different on those shots, you are describing! center to right edge, center to left edge, different reference points and pivots!
 
With your eyes "straddling the ctel" as your starting position...you move your eyes until the cb inside edge hits a b or c (touches the same vertical line in your field of vision). At that point, the 180 deg view of the cb is what you slide into with your tip offset.

Sent from my SPH-M910 using Tapatalk
If you end up with your eyes on the edge-to-aimpoint line, why not start there? What's the purpose of starting with your eyes on the CTE line?

If the edge-to-aimpoint line is the view that puts your eyes in position to see the CB's "aiming center", then what part does the CTE line play in finding this perspective?

Why the seemingly needless steps in the process?

pj
chgo
 
On a straighter cut, your pool brain knows you need to face in the direction which aligns the balls for a fuller hit. This allows A or C to be obvious on one edge of the cue ball. For a thinner cut, your set up gravitates to a line where the edge of the object ball is used. This establishes B in your visuals.

There won't be a flashing arrow. If they are not there, move your eyes until they are. Poke your head out. Your body will follow. It's a small move. Is your body angled toward the shot :yes: or are you standing square?

I use both eyes to sight the lines. Left for left edge, right for right edge. Once you establish your visuals, figure out your pivot direction. If it's not right, you guessed it. Use the other way.

At first you will steer the cue ball like grandpa behind the wheel. It happens to everybody. Trust your alignment and after a while it will become more natural.

Best,
Mike
 
champ2107:
I think you can bring a lot of positives to this whole cte stuff if you stop with the negatives and go with the positives!
"Stop with the negatives" means stop asking questions about CTE that its users can't answer? Those "negatives" are CTE's, not mine.

pj
chgo
 
On a straighter cut, your pool brain knows you need to face in the direction which aligns the balls for a fuller hit. This allows A or C to be obvious on one edge of the cue ball. For a thinner cut, your set up gravitates to a line where the edge of the object ball is used. This establishes B in your visuals.

There won't be a flashing arrow. If they are not there, move your eyes until they are. Poke your head out. Your body will follow. It's a small move. Is your body angled toward the shot :yes: or are you standing square?

I use both eyes to sight the lines. Left for left edge, right for right edge. Once you establish your visuals, figure out your pivot direction. If it's not right, you guessed it. Use the other way.

At first you will steer the cue ball like grandpa behind the wheel. It happens to everybody. Trust your alignment and after a while it will become more natural.

Best,
Mike
In other words, learn it by feel.

There's nothing wrong with that except that it's been denied for so long.

pj
chgo
 
If you end up with your eyes on the edge-to-aimpoint line, why not start there? What's the purpose of starting with your eyes on the CTE line?

If the edge-to-aimpoint line is the view that puts your eyes in position to see the CB's "aiming center", then what part does the CTE line play in finding this perspective?

Why the seemingly needless steps in the process?

pj
chgo

Because the system is based on visual consistency to allow your body to set up in the proper position to pocket the ball. Your brain uses this repetitive information to establish an alignment by learning through experience.

Both eyes are involved in shooting. By sighting only one reference, you are cheating the mind of the necessary feedback to line up correctly on the ball. You are not aiming fractionally. Let your body set up by following what the eyes see, not by what you think the contact point is.

Best,
Mike
 
pablocruz (you know, the guy I was talking to) said that we can see different CTE lines formed by the same stationary balls. Are you agreeing with him? Or are you acting stupid on purpose?

pj
chgo

I can see different cte lines from 2 stationary balls.
 
Me:
If you end up with your eyes on the edge-to-aimpoint line, why not start there? What's the purpose of starting with your eyes on the CTE line?

If the edge-to-aimpoint line is the view that puts your eyes in position to see the CB's "aiming center", then what part does the CTE line play in finding this perspective?

Why the seemingly needless steps in the process?
Mikjary:
Because the system is based on visual consistency to allow your body to set up in the proper position to pocket the ball. Your brain uses this repetitive information to establish an alignment by learning through experience.
So there is no specific place to position your eyes? Just "learn through experience"? At what point did we leave the systematic part of the system behind?

Both eyes are involved in shooting. By sighting only one reference, you are cheating the mind of the necessary feedback to line up correctly on the ball. You are not aiming fractionally. Let your body set up by following what the eyes see, not by what you think the contact point is.
What the hell does that mean?

pj
chgo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top