F me. I laughed so hard I think I broke a rib. I'm going to sue somebody over this. I think it will be Pat.
John Barton Meets Professor Johnson
- Thread starter SpiderWebComm
- Start date
Well, you know it's always only the CTE supporters who actually DO SOMETHING.
The naysayers COULD make their own sarcastic videos on Extranormal but they won't even bother to do that.
I am sure they already have a lot of material they could use with all the snake-oil and con men accusations they sling.
The real funny thing is that I met Professor Johnson in real life and he wouldn't try CTE then either.
I think I have it hidden away from the Copyright police .. Lemme look.
If you have to beg, your not worthy.
Wanna bet, thats just funny I don't care who you are.
Damn, I watched it again this morning and I think I broke another rib. I've got to stop watching it. The look, the voice -- it's the perfect Pat.
Absolutely hilarious!!! Thanks for a great laugh this early morning...K+
brad21156
Registered
Patrick meets Spidey
That was so funny I had to take a shot at making one today.
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/11552399/the-big-johnson/?listid=21784741
That was so funny I had to take a shot at making one today.
http://www.xtranormal.com/watch/11552399/the-big-johnson/?listid=21784741
Why does Professor Johnson look like Bob Jewett? 
brad21156
Registered
There's enough material with all this arguing to do a full length movie.
Those are hilarious, as well. Both Hitler vids...
(Of course, after seeing me watching them, my 14 year old is pulling up that same video footage someone has used to complain about some new song that some singer has put out. Apparently the copyright police have given up.
)
Not to be a wet blanket here, but I was talking to my Sister over the phone this morning and asked her if information going out over the internet, that could in some way be harmful to another person, be considered libel. The reason I asked was because I was curious about this thread.
My Sister, who has been a practicing attorney in Denver, for many years, told me that the criteria for any actions involving defamation would hinge on three basic factors: (1) Was the defamed party's actual name used. (2) Did defamation, or libel actually occur. (3) Did enough people see the offense to cause damage. Since it happened on the internet, she said, rule number three could be easily satisfied.
According to my Sister, one of the primary reasons for avatars on forum sites, and other places, was to avoid this very thing from happening. Avatars tend to create an artificial invironment that generally avoids direct confrontation, lessening the chance any potential libel.
So, don't shoot me, I'm only the messenger here. Just telling you what Sis said.
My Sister, who has been a practicing attorney in Denver, for many years, told me that the criteria for any actions involving defamation would hinge on three basic factors: (1) Was the defamed party's actual name used. (2) Did defamation, or libel actually occur. (3) Did enough people see the offense to cause damage. Since it happened on the internet, she said, rule number three could be easily satisfied.
According to my Sister, one of the primary reasons for avatars on forum sites, and other places, was to avoid this very thing from happening. Avatars tend to create an artificial invironment that generally avoids direct confrontation, lessening the chance any potential libel.
So, don't shoot me, I'm only the messenger here. Just telling you what Sis said.