Please give me the support other refuse to, and add something to the original thread, whether you agree with me or not your comments are more than welcome.
Thanks for your consideration.
Here ya go...
Okay…here’s my take on the whole “design theft” issue.
There is one and only one Mona Lisa. It’s an original. (It is worth millions…if not more.)
There are probably a very small handful of paintings that could very easily pass as the original done by artists who would be considered “masters”. (Ranging into the $10,000’s or more…I’m guessing.)
There are probably thousands of very good renditions done by skilled artists. (Ranging in price from $100’s to $1000’s…depending on WHO painted them.)
There are hundreds of thousands of “prints” of the Mona Lisa. (Can be had for $20).
Are the paintings and prints copies? Yes, there’s no denying that. Is it thievery to paint or in any fashion replicate the Mona Lisa? Not in my opinion… I don’t believe it becomes “theft” until the person signs the painting Leonardo DaVinci and tries to pass it off as the “original”.
If I write the words “Clint Eastwood” and someone else writes the words “Old West Action”, should I be screaming plagiarism? I mean for gosh sake, that person used the same exact letters I did to create their phrase (it’s an anagram)! No, I shouldn’t. However, if I write a short story and someone copies the story verbatim, is it plagiarism then? Yes…it is! When words are used and copied verbatim, there is no way the person copying them can put their own “twist” into the words (yes, one could print and the other could write in cursive…stay with me).
There are 26 letters in the English alphabet. Someone can take those 26 letters and arrange those letters into a series of words, sentences and paragraphs and write a book about Willie Mosconi and have something “original”. Someone else can take those same 26 letters and arrange them into a different series of words, sentences and paragraphs and write a different book about Willie Mosconi. If both books contain several of the same stories, is one “copying” the other or is it giving two different perspectives of the same situation?
There are two basic “artistic” abilities when it comes to making cues…the design and the playability…how a cue plays and how it looks. The true “master cuemakers” are/were able to achieve both…in most cases!
You can have cues that are “plain janes” that have the “best hit ever”!
You can have cues that are pure artistic “originals” that play like absolute crap!
You can have cues that possess both playability and artistic prowess!
Not every cuemaker has the “creativity” of an artist when it comes to the design of their cues…but they can make one hell of a playing cue…so, these cuemakers are either resigned to making “plain janes” their entire career or they need to use designs that are already out there…and put their own name on their version of that design. Will it look the same as the original? Pretty close sometimes. Will it “play” the same as the original? Highly doubtful…sometimes worse…sometimes better!
So, I guess I look at it this way…
If a person copies a story word for word, it’s thievery because there is no way to put your own “spin” on what you’ve just done even if you put your name at the end of the story! If someone takes a story and tells it from a different perspective, then they’ve put their own “spin” on the story…they’ve changed something about the “original”...thus, I do not believe it is thievery.
That’s how I view this subject. The materials used to build the cue are the letters and words. The design of the cue is the “story”. The playability of the cue is each cuemaker’s individual perspective of the “story” – each one written slightly differently…
It’s only “thievery” if the person building the copy/tribute/replica tries to pass it off as the original by not signing their own name, but rather the name of the original cuemaker…
Anyway…just some late night ramblings…
Jason