Ball in hand?

What's the penalty for creating a 3rd account after the other 2 were banned? That's how many kicks in the groin?

It's sad but it's so obvious it's the same person, down to the "WE" have rules about this. He could mean "we" as in his other personalities.

And his first post was about "And what is this? http www facebook com pages A-Beginners-Guide-to-8-Ball-Pool 446697018684848 (sry don't have 5 points yet :/) Didn't know we were at war ROFLMAO"

BANNED baby... see ya. And swing by a pharmacy to pick up your pills, you may need to up the dosage.
 
Last edited:
What's the over/under on how long it takes him (or "them", I suppose, heh) to return?

:p
 
If there is no penalty for "pushing out" on every shot, a game can go on forever, both players just returning push for push.

There IS an option for those who don't like one foul BIH, the kitchen or "no rule" bar rules. It's the way we played in the NPBA, which was the first national league organization (1959-1986?). We played two foul BIH and three-foul loss. Now THIS was challenging and fun for the strategist, but of course it could make a match longer.

Donny L
PBIA/ACS Instructor

In the original push out rules bih was awarded after the second foul regardless of whether it was an accidental push {no ball contact} or a scratch. It varied by regional rules as to whether it was any two fouls or two fouls by the same player. I've never heard of anyone playing push on every shot without a penalty, though this is the way the game is understood by the uninitiated. The first I ever heard of loss of game via three consecutive fouls was playing One Pocket and only when playing for money. This was in the early to mid or late seventies.
 
In the original push out rules bih was awarded after the second foul regardless of whether it was an accidental push {no ball contact} or a scratch. It varied by regional rules as to whether it was any two fouls or two fouls by the same player. I've never heard of anyone playing push on every shot without a penalty, though this is the way the game is understood by the uninitiated. The first I ever heard of loss of game via three consecutive fouls was playing One Pocket and only when playing for money. This was in the early to mid or late seventies.
Correction on my previous post. I just checked my old copy of the NPBA rules, and there was no 3-foul loss of game. And the NBPA was still functioning at least through 1993.
The VNEA, however, did use the 3-foul loss in 8-ball from 1981 till 1988. Not sure about the BCA, as I didn't see a copy of their rules till 1991.

Donny L
PBIA/ACS Instructor
 
Correction on my previous post. I just checked my old copy of the NPBA rules, and there was no 3-foul loss of game. And the NBPA was still functioning at least through 1993.
The VNEA, however, did use the 3-foul loss in 8-ball from 1981 till 1988. Not sure about the BCA, as I didn't see a copy of their rules till 1991.

Donny L
PBIA/ACS Instructor

I have the BCA rule book from 1980 and the last of 7 loss of game rules is three consecutive fouls, that's in 8 ball. There was no ball-in-hand-anywhere rule for fouls, only bih behind the head string. The 9 ball rules do not list any three-fouls-loss-of-game rule and the "shoot-out rules" were optional, though the incoming player was awarded ball in hand.
 
Last edited:
I have the BCA rule book from 1980 and the last of 7 loss of game rules is three consecutive fouls, that's in 8 ball. There was no ball-in-hand-anywhere rule for fouls, only bih behind the head string. The 9 ball rules do not list any three-fouls-loss-of-game rule and the "shoot-out rules" were optional, though the incoming player was awarded ball in hand.
As pointed out in this history of the rules of eight ball ( http://www.sfbilliards.com/articles/2002-02.pdf ) the BCA had the three foul rule and ball-in-hand-anywhere at the same time briefly at the start of the 1980s. They soon fixed that mistake.
 
Well, Melvis has left the building, again.

If I wanted to get another login after being banned, I'd be careful to keep a low profile and change my posting style. Remember the recent incarnation of PocketPoint who managed to maintain his fake "illiterate and brain damaged" style for about three posts before he reverted to natural? Some people are just too impatient.
 
Back
Top