I've been thinking about this for a while. There’s been a lot of talk and opinions about what needs to happen in pool for it to become something greater than it is now. I'm trying to take a step back and understand the motivations behind what players want the pool industry to be, and I can't definitively say what exactly that is.
I think the three major camps are 120degrees separated: one would like to see pool become a national entertainment event and fit into the professional athletic game mold, similar to how England views their cue sport. The second wants the game structured to support the domination of other players (and maybe androcentricity?) and probably verification of their own self-worth, and the third wishes to commit themselves to the technical challenge and pursuit of pocket billiards excellence independent of the popularity of the game. There’s a mix on where one falls on the triangle.
I find myself in the third camp, where I consider the game a practice in meditation and peacefulness. I like playing the game by myself and I only have a fierce competitive spirit against myself, and not towards other players. In fact I am starting to feel that I don’t even like other pool players. I think I play simply because it helps me relax.
Maybe from my perspective I am having trouble understanding the feeling of urgency for an industrial push that is taking place in the pool world. Is it really all based on money? Is money what is needed to satisfy the investment made in developing a skill in a game?
I wonder if chess players expect an eventual payout? I wonder if they even label themselves as chess players the same way pool players label themselves.
I don’t know. Maybe I don’t understand people that well.
Help me understand.
I think the three major camps are 120degrees separated: one would like to see pool become a national entertainment event and fit into the professional athletic game mold, similar to how England views their cue sport. The second wants the game structured to support the domination of other players (and maybe androcentricity?) and probably verification of their own self-worth, and the third wishes to commit themselves to the technical challenge and pursuit of pocket billiards excellence independent of the popularity of the game. There’s a mix on where one falls on the triangle.
I find myself in the third camp, where I consider the game a practice in meditation and peacefulness. I like playing the game by myself and I only have a fierce competitive spirit against myself, and not towards other players. In fact I am starting to feel that I don’t even like other pool players. I think I play simply because it helps me relax.
Maybe from my perspective I am having trouble understanding the feeling of urgency for an industrial push that is taking place in the pool world. Is it really all based on money? Is money what is needed to satisfy the investment made in developing a skill in a game?
I wonder if chess players expect an eventual payout? I wonder if they even label themselves as chess players the same way pool players label themselves.
I don’t know. Maybe I don’t understand people that well.
Help me understand.