JB stoops to new lows

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nice Try

Personally, if I were new to this site, and saw what you have posted about John, his wife, and his cases.

Well I knew you would try to twist things around and not stay on the subject.
Yes I have responded & posted things about John on azb
Yes I have responded & posted things about cases on azb
NO I have NEVER,EVER,EVER posted anything about Johns wife on AZB or anywhere else. Yes I have made some comments but NEVER,EVER have said anywords like johns wife,Ms. Barton,Mrs.Barton,Karen,Karen Barton,Johns girlfriend or otherwise so you,jb and all others are beating another dead horse.
 
Yes it is quite simple you don't have to read this thread if you don't want to
John himself told me to start a thread on his cutting down of Jacks cases
Ask and you shall receive and according to John this is only giving him much needed advertising for free and all you have to do is read johns apology list to know he has offended many and you want to talk about my credibility now that's a good one


1

I was not speaking as to this thread specifically....your stroke is much broader than this thread.
 
Well I knew you would try to twist things around and not stay on the subject.
Yes I have responded & posted things about John on azb
Yes I have responded & posted things about cases on azb
NO I have NEVER,EVER,EVER posted anything about Johns wife on AZB or anywhere else. Yes I have made some comments but NEVER,EVER have said anywords like johns wife,Ms. Barton,Mrs.Barton,Karen,Karen Barton,Johns girlfriend or otherwise so you,jb and all others are beating another dead horse.

Bobby, with all due respect...I saw the your post...the intent was pretty clear...to many, many members here. You, yourself stated that your own daughter told you what you posted was wrong...so her perception must have been the same. However you wish to play with the context of the remark, you made the remark, all the same.

And yet...you sidestep the fact that I have made no disparaging remarks concerning Jack's cases....as you have gone out of your way to make concerning John's cases. Good on ya.
 
Last edited:
Bobby, with all due respect...I saw the your post...the intent was pretty clear...to many, many members here. You, yourself stated that your own daughter told you what you posted was wrong...so her perception must have been the same. However you wish to play with the context of the remark, you made the remark, all the same.

My daughters comment to me was that it was a bad comment toward all women and was wrong.I also apologized also for it to all women.
 
Deflection is not gonna get ya off the hook.

Again don't twist it around.This has nothing to do with me or getting off any hook.
You just cant dissect jbs comments about Americans and sex with gays.
So if you cant comment then you must agree with his actions.
 
My daughters comment to me was that it was a bad comment toward all women and was wrong.I also apologized also for it to all women.

I wasn't the only one who called you on that remark, and found it to be offensive. You should take up country and western dancing....ya got a mean sidestep!

Be a man, and own what ya posted. Be a man, and back up your ass with the allegations you make. Be a man, and admit that you are not Jack's mouthpiece. Be a man.
 
Again don't twist it around.This has nothing to do with me or getting off any hook.
You just cant dissect jbs comments about Americans and sex with gays.
So if you cant comment then you must agree with his actions.

Maybe because the thread you are attempting to direct me to, has nothing to do with what is being discussed here. I am trying to stay on topic...and not muddy the waters further, as you are attempting to do.

The fact remains, that I have never made a disparaging remark concerning Jack's cases, yet you accuse me of 'stalking' the JB detractors' threads/posts. You seem to make a lot of comments and allegations here that simply cannot be backed up. one stroke does the same, as does PSA. Several members in this thread alone have asked for proof of the allegations against John being made here....and yet, those requests go ignored.

Have you, one stroke, or PSA ever even owned a JB case? I'm not talking about seeing one from across a pool room...I'm talking about personal, real world, end-user experiences. I'm betting not. So how can you justify making disparaging remarks about a case you have no practical experience with?!! It's called talking out the side of your neck about something you have no personal knowledge of.

I'm not gonna comment about Jack's cases, because I have no practical, real world experience with them. You would be best served to do the same.
 
Last edited:
It's not a condom , protection is overrated unless you have no regard for it in the first place , I have had many cases and not once has one of my cues been damaged and i dont drive a armored car in fear of a accident either,
I'm more than sure I represent the norm instead of the exception to the rule,

I don't think we need a slow mo on the construction of a pool case it's not a rocket ship for gods sake

I would hope given his overall cost of materials and labor that he can offer a cheap case but I find it interesting given how proud he has stated he is of supporting 15 families and his own that he does not put a made in China stamp on them


1


At one time in recent history it was thought that protection was overrated for cars too. In fact the automobile industry fought hard against seatbelts, airbags, crumple zones, reinforced doors, etc.... and now they compete to advertise that their cars are the safest and perform best in safety tests.

1959BelAir-2009Malibu.png


Which of these two cars would you rather be in if involved in a head-on collision?

watch


I can tell you that you would definitely look WAY COOLER riding in the 59 Bel Air.

Until the crash with the 2009 Malibu fused you into the Bel Air permanently.

2009 Chevy Malibu vs 1959 Bel Air Crash Test

_______________________________________

You say protection is over rated for pool cues. Well maybe that's because you never had one broken because the case didn't protect it well enough. I had a cue fall out of a case that got inverted and broke the butt cap.

I had a cue broken because it was caught in a car door.

___________________________________________


Who are you to say that protection is overrated? Are you going to be responsible for my gear? Did you buy my cues? Did you build my cues?

No you didn't. So who are you again to tell me how I well I should protect my cues or what protection I should want for my cues.

Here is a video of a guy who builds super protective guitar cases. Guitars are also wooden instruments.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yc2fspfvz1g

Here is a video of what happens when the guitar case DOES NOT protect the instrument properly

United Breaks Guitars


Bottom line is that in the billiard industry there have been several case makers who have advertised their superior protection, Fellini and Porper among them. I bought my first Porper specifically because my soft case didn't protect the cue against breakage when the case was caught in the car door. Then later I gave up the Porper for the Flowers and thought that the Flowers would protect as well as the Porper and it didn't. That's when I realized not all "tube" cases were made to actually protect the same way.

So I built my own to protect cues better than the Porper that I had loved and certainly better than the much more expensive Flowers/NoraVanHorn case.

And all that was because my $1400 Schon had gotten damaged. When I lost my $150 McDermott to the car door incident I wasn't even motivated to buy a new case. My girlfriend surprised me with the Porper and she had picked it out because it was more protective. The case at that time was $150 and worth more than my cue. But she knew that the cue was important to me to have something familiar to play with when gambling and we both loved to gamble on pool at the time.

Later when the Schon was broken was when I started to think more about cases and how well they protect cues. For me $1400 was a lot to invest in a cue. Until then the most I had spent on a cue was about $200. So no, you don't get to tell me that protection is overrated when it's not your gear and not your money.

When you are willing to pay for damage then I will be willing to use less protection.
 
Last edited:
Maybe because the thread you are attempting to direct me to, has nothing to do with what is being discussed here. I am trying to stay on topic...and not muddy the waters further, as you are attempting to do.

The fact remains, that I have never made a disparaging remark concerning Jack's cases, yet you accuse me of 'stalking' the JB detractors' threads/posts. You seem to make a lot of comments and allegations here that simply cannot be backed up. one stroke does the same, as does PSA. Several members in this thread alone have asked for proof of the allegations against John being made here....and yet, those requests go ignored.

Have you, one stroke, or PSA ever even owned a JB case? I'm not talking about seeing one from across a pool room...I'm talking about personal, real world, end-user experiences. I'm betting not. So how can you justify making disparaging remarks about a case you have no practical experience with?!! It's called talking out the side of your neck about something you have no personal knowledge of.

I'm not gonna comment about Jack's cases, because I have no practical, real world experience with them. You would be best served to do the same.
1st off im not jacks mouthpiece so now that you know I geuss the way it works in the Jb club is since you just called me a mouthpiece then I am completely right to start calling you names and stalking you so watch out.haha

next this thread has been all over the place but since you say jbs comments don't have anything to do with this thread and it will only muddy up the threrad I will give you the opportunity to stay on track to what a thread is about to the opening op statements I will just start up the new thread concerning jbs comments then you can reply in the thread to your opinion.That is why this thread was started to stay out of another thread.I look forward to seeing your comments when I post the new thread.
 
Just remember these words of wisdom:

Kirk Lazarus: Everybody knows you never go full retard.

Tugg Speedman: What do you mean?

Kirk Lazarus: Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, 'Rain Man,' look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Counted toothpicks, cheated cards. Autistic, sho'. Not retarded.
You know Tom Hanks, 'Forrest Gump.' Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded.
Peter Sellers, "Being There." Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard.
You don't buy that? Ask Sean Penn, 2001, "I Am Sam." Remember? Went full retard, went home empty handed...

Best post in the whole thread!
 
1st off im not jacks mouthpiece so now that you know I geuss the way it works in the Jb club is since you just called me a mouthpiece then I am completely right to start calling you names and stalking you so watch out.haha

next this thread has been all over the place but since you say jbs comments don't have anything to do with this thread and it will only muddy up the threrad I will give you the opportunity to stay on track to what a thread is about to the opening op statements I will just start up the new thread concerning jbs comments then you can reply in the thread to your opinion.That is why this thread was started to stay out of another thread.I look forward to seeing your comments when I post the new thread.

Huh? Your posts are difficult, at best, to read. There's these nifty little things called punctuation....you might try using them.

Unlike yourself...I have done my best to stay on topic with the thread...which is, "JB is stooping to new lows!!!"

The sad part of it is....John may well have not even started his newest project if it weren't for, as he has coined the name, the JackPack. Y'all have been pushing him pretty good for a while now.

If you are not Jack's mouthpiece, then quit acting like you are speaking for him...which you absolutely do. You are doing him a great disservice.

And quit sidestepping every question posed to you, by trying a deflection maneuver...which isn't working. There are lots and lots of AZB members here that have absolutely no problem with reading comprehension...you are not among them.
 
Joe, as I have previously stated, I just simply do not read or post here no where near what I used to. I have gone a couple of months without the urge to come to AZB...because I am pretty much over what the site has become as of late.....just one pissin' match after another. Everybody is pissin' all over everybody else...for all different sorts of reasons. It gets old, and off-putting.

So, I am unaware of this recent allegation. Is there proof somewhere that this actually took place?

Yes he admitted it.

JV
 
Protection Matters

http://www.youtube.com/user/reunionbluesgigbags

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P73QY8mBUdw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajTg87sqrJw

"I love love love my new case. I can't believe how well made it is. I was nervous about buying this case at first, but Joan was right, a little investment is definitely worth it when protecting my $17,000 Burkart. And I can't believe how helpful and kind Joan was on the phone with me."

Flute%20Case.png


www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR_WUG5JY70

In fact EVERY video on YouTube that talks about protection features PADDED cases that are form fitting.

All this nonsense stems from the flat out FACT that a guy who DOES NOT CARE about your cues decided to make excuses for the fact that he didn't bother to pad the cases or otherwise take any extra steps to protect your cues over what the case makers did whom he copied his construction methods from.

Instead of either keeping quiet on the subject or IMPROVING the protection in his cases he chose to instead attempt to discredit the protective features of our cases and claim that out protective features are actually harmful to cues.

Now, forget cue cases for a moment.

EVERY other industry and hobby in the WORLD - on the WHOLE PLANET uses foam lined form-fitted cases as the HIGHEST LEVEL of protection available to protect the valuable contents from damage. No matter what the item is the VERY BEST cases are always well padded and shick absorbing.

So it's frankly ludicrous to EVER EVER EVER say that a case with LESS padding is more protective than one with more padding. That's just common sense as anyone who has ever packed a box or a suitcase knows.

But this entire situation we have right now between myself and Jack Justis stems from his taking offense at my claim that our padded cases protect better than his (then) unpadded ones. The WHOLE thing comes from that.

I mean honestly WTF???

Ok so fine, the guy wants to ATTEMPT to justify the way he builds cases with lame reasoning and then when I answer back with logical reasoning it's not enough to make him quit he has to go and find some other way to try and discredit me.

And that is why we are here. Plain and simple, the guy who makes an INFERIOR case can't handle it and the people who spent the most money on that INFERIOR case can't handle the truth and so they have to use every dirty trick they can think of to put me on tilt.

And guess what?

It worked, because they have put me on tilt over and over and over.

But in addition to being on tilt so many times I have also been MOTIVATED to continue to improve our products, to continue to study protectiveness and to continue to try and build protective and practical cue cases.

So, JackPack, you guys can continue doing what you do and trying to tell everyone that protection is overrated but people are not stupid and the REST OF THE WORLD in every other industry and hobby disagrees with you.
 
So, what did he report for, and why?

I'm curious to the answer of this as well. Don't know that story, and will with hold judgement. However, unless it was for something pretty damn serious, reporting a competitor to authorities, especially in another country, sounds about as low and petty as one can go.
 
I think everyone who's ever going to buy one of John's case knows full well where they're made. It's public knowledge easily obtainable. It doesn't really matter if he puts it on his case or not. The fact that you're stating this directly shows the deeper bigotry and negative agenda you have against John.

At least John's not attempting to state his case was made in good ol USA, bash products from China, source his parts from China, and work with Chinese case manufacturers so he can make more money off his name.

Who's the hypocrite?


Oh I could not find that on one of his cases well good he should have no problem then putting it on his justice copy


1
 
Sorry, these '500 Internal Server Error' messages are making it extremely time-consuming to post replies...if at all.

So, what did he report for, and why?

Jack made a comment on the forum that I don't have business license a few years ago.

So I did a little research into his "business". Turns out that the city where he lives does not allow for manufacturing in the neighborhood he lives in.

I called them up and said I was interested in buying a house on Jack's block and if I would be ok to make leather cases there in my garage. They said no, it's not zoned for any kind of fabrication business.

I said ok thanks. Then I sent Jack an email and told him to knock it off because he was operating a business out of his house illegally. Glass houses -throwing stones that sort of thing.

He told me to go ahead and report him. So I did. I was pretty sure nothing would come of it but I wanted to show him that he can't continue to screw with me and not have some consequences.

The fact is that Jack IS operating illegally. That the zoning commission or whomever is responsible for enforcing it CHOOSES not to bother with it in Jack's case doesn't mean it's not illegal.

People need to realize that when they take things to new levels that they should be prepared for all that comes with it. You want to call me out on every possible level you can think of? All right, let's go there and see who comes out of it.

All this comes down to the idea that I am some sort of mega corporation trying to trample the little guy. All bullshit.

I started out with less than $100 in my attic and moved to a basement room that was almost too small to turn around in. From just me, to a few helpers I have grown my very REAL business into something that affects the LIVES of many people.

Over the twenty years I have been in this business I have been responsible for the employment of dozens of people directly and profits from our cases have contributed to the employment of hundreds of people, thousands actually.

So when Jack knocks me with lies and innuendo, when the Jack Pack takes their lead from him and knocks me with lies and defamatory statements I take it seriously.

And I hit back.

Jack Justis makes cases as hobby out of his Florida home. He has no real business. He operates on a "home office" license because he cannot get a business license to manufacture leather goods in his home due to the zoning laws. He competes with case makers who do operate as licensed businesses with overhead and employees in commercial spaces.

Ok fine, so what, this is a free country right, work where you want and how you want.

I agree.

I AGREE

But don't go off making remarks to insinuate that your competition is operating illegally IF you are already operating illegally.

THAT's the POINT.

If you want to ratchet things up to those levels then don't be surprised at what stones get overturned and what is revealed. All this could have been avoided if two things would not have happened,

1. Jack didn't make bullshit fake excuses to cover up his lack of protection when challenged on it.

2. Jack didn't make false allegations and continued lies about me and my products.

If I were a retired hobby case maker making all the cases I chose to make out of my house with no overhead and those cases were not that great to start with - ok - but not great - then I would simply shut the hell up and enjoy the reputation and orders and not try to stir up the hornet's nest.

A very simple statement of, "I build the cases the way I think works best" would have been enough and we wouldn't be here.

How could I argue with that? I build the cases the way I think works best is all he had to say......fair enough Jack, keep up the good work, you do make some very pretty cases, see you at the next show, let the customers examine all choices and make their choice. We can be friends and disagree about the way a case is built, no problem.

Instead, what we get are lame excuses as to WHY he builds the cases the way he does all in an attempt to not have to change. When in fact he didn't have to change in the first place if he has a line of customers who are HAPPY with what he makes.

Cues need airflow - BUSTED
Cues need to move - BUSTED
Snug fit damages finish - BUSTED
Restricting movement is bad - BUSTED
Padding for the bottom is not needed - BUSTED

Do you know WHY I started offering replacement interiors for Justis case?

I did it because when all this crap started I then started to take a much harder look at the Justis cases and I found out that the interior tube fits very loosely in the skin. So in the course of the heated exchanges I mentioned that I thought that this was sloppy work to have a super loose leather bag with a tube dropped in it.

I thought and still think that this was done to make it super easy for Jack to put the tubes in. If so then smart for him but lousy for the customer in my opinion.

But then Jack came back with the "reason" given that he DELIBERATELY makes the case so loose so that the customer can easily remove and replace the interior if they need to.

So I thought well ok then if that's true then I will make a version of our interior and offer that to Jack's customers. And I did.

BUT that would have NEVER occurred to me to do if not for this ongoing feud that Jack started and which he continued to fuel with snide remarks motivating me to investigate his product and practices more and more.

I have never made a single remark about my product that I am not prepared to back up 100%. I don't make up bullshit excuses as to why I do what I do, I have practical and TRUE reasons for what I do and not all of them are good ideas. When I find that I have done something that turns out to not be a good way to do it I change it.

I change it. I don't make up bullshit stories to justify it, I change it.

Now, if I were in Jack's shoes I would not want to have ANY discussion at all about protection or quality. None. I would want to keep as quiet as a church mouse and enjoy the fruit of my labor without anyone looking too closely at my stuff.

In my shoes I want everyone to look closely at my stuff, I want it examined, poked, prodded, dissected, and criticized fairly.

So yeah I called the "man" to go pay Jack a visit. And the JackPack has said they will retaliate by calling the Chinese police to make sure my "papers" are in order, has said they will call US Customs and Homeland Security to harass me at the border, and said they will call Queer Eye for the Straight Guy to criticize my fashion choices.

Point being if you choose to take it to unreasonable levels then unreasonable things happen.

If the Jack Pack continues to raise the bar then I will continue to be more motivated to do whatever I feel I need to do. I have tried many times to simply stop and ignore them but they are very good at throwing their jabs and snide remarks, almost like a game between them to see who can get me to break first.

Well boys I don't know who won the bet but the consumers are the big winners with a $300 Justis Replica coming soon. Hope you're happy now. And jsut for you I will STAMP Made in China right on it in such a way that people will be proud to show off the label.
 
In agreement with many of your common sense statements in the is thread JB, I find myself posting this saying for the second time today.

Be careful for what you wish for, you might get it. I guess people just got affordable JJ cases now.

I'll take mine Sans any stamps on it. A signature will suffice.

Just kidding, I have no desire to own a JJ case or a tribute.

I have been using a hard shell case made in Japan that has a very protective interior in it.
Actually very close to your new Butterfly interior. I think you'd approve. Zippers and removable as well.

I still have my heart set on a JB Butterfly case with the heavy duty nylon that you use.
Then the baggage handlers can throw that one around all they like.

Mine has a combo lock on it. Any possibility that you could incorporate one on yours or the ability to put a lock on the zippers? I like the idea of a combo lock on mine.

After I take my cues out at the hall or bar, I lock her up and know that no one is going to be messing with the cues left inside.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top