Pathetic Shark
Banned
Mainly because AZB members have a tendency to behave like hysterical schoolgirls, as parts of this thread demonstrate.
Ironic as this is a forum for old men.
Mainly because AZB members have a tendency to behave like hysterical schoolgirls, as parts of this thread demonstrate.
Another businesses entity disrupting pool. Sadly, unproven and with out product to display and no product pipeline.
Just when we thought the bonus ball smoke had cleared this smacks the industry dead in the face.
Poor TAR keeps taking it on the chin. John it is time to man up and show some loyalty. They produced the two prior matches and created the interest in this match. You really need to consider which businesses relationship is MORE important and investigate terminating the one that does not work for you!
Kd
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 2
LOL, Punter. :grin-square:
Actually, the tension in the pool world today is between the pool purists versus the action enthusiasts. I mean, there's a whole sub-forum on action, here at AzBilliards, which speaks for itself, I guess. :wink:
The pool purists, however, would prefer no smack talking and no gambling. There's quite a few of them who post on the Main Forum every day. They believe that gambling is the culprit for keeping pool in the doldrums. In fact, there is a Euro tour that doesn't pay any money to the winners, but they do give out titles and trophies. :tongue:
As the saying goes, different strokes for different folks.![]()
Not disagreeing with you, but I did want to point out that the TAR match ups aren't gambling.
And where did I say that TAR was gambling?
You didn't. I just quoted your post since it was the most recent to mention TAR. I also prefaced it by saying I didn't disagree with you, just so you wouldn't think I was "trolling" you.
It has been brought to our attention that there are multiple threads about a possible Schmidt /Harriman match. We know Mark Cantrill started working on this match a couple of days ago and that he has spoken to both players. We were informed last night by Mark Cantrill that both players had agreed verbally with him to do the match. We were told a few hours ago that TAR came in and also made an offer to host the Schmidt /Harriman match.
When Mark Cantrill set about putting this match together, he really had no idea that the level of hostility that existed between the two players was so intense. It did not become apparent until late yesterday afternoon. At that time that he contacted us and shared what he had learned.
Marc and I spent several hours last night and again this afternoon discussing this match. A few minutes ago we had a conference call with both Mark Cantrill and John Schmidt. During that conversation we explained to John Schmidt, who is a Str8 Shots signed player that we did not feel this match was in line with the direction that Str8 Shots intends to take the players, the team, or the company. We understand why this match is such a hot topic and why it would be an exceptional PPV event. The reasons that make this match so attractive to those that would buy it, are the very reasons we feel it is not in John’s best interest.
We chose several professional players to be a part of team Str8 Shots because they are all great people. Every one of them has a contract with us. In that contract it states that they will get permission from Str8 Shots management before engaging in activities, or aligning themselves, with individuals or activities that could be potentially harmful to their images, the company’s image, or the industry’s image.
When we plan matches, we have a purpose for them above and beyond providing the players with opportunities to test their skills or generate some additional income. Our opinion is that this match only serves to create additional animosity between these players and that is not what we want for any player; whether they are associated with this company or not.
We understand that both offers made to the men provided them with the potential to make several thousand dollars. We are also aware that the money to be made off of this PPV match by Str8 Shots or TAR could be quite substantial. That being said, we have asked John Schmidt NOT to do this match. John Schmidt will be compensated by Str8 Shots for the potential loss of income. He has generously offered to donate a portion of those monies to the Str8 Shots Juniors program.
Thank you for your time. I hope you all have a wonderful evening.
Kimberly Griffiths
(877)921 -9511 ext. 121
kimberly@str8-shots.com
www.str8-shots.com
Okay, Beiber Lover. Thank you for this valuable contribution to the thread.
Makes perfect sense. Nothing is worse for pro pool than real exposure, real competition, and guaranteed payouts. Wait... it's the other way around.
Why don't you tell us what this is really about. Sounds to me like St8 Shots wants a cut of the PPV revenue.
Mainly because AZB members have a tendency to behave like hysterical schoolgirls, as parts of this thread demonstrate.
I am going to try and give you the sponsor's perspective here. As someone who has been involved with sponsoring players for 20 years I can see Str8Shot's position somewhat.
Especially if their focus has been on the Junior programs prior to this venture.
I used to speak with Janet Shimel once in a while and when Earl was dropped by Cuetec he made some really nasty remarks about the brand, the cue and the people who supported him for so long. I asked Janet how she felt about those comments and she said they hurt her deeply because for the duration of the whole sponsorship she had dealt with people threatening to and actually boycotting her brand because of Earl's antics. She fielded the calls, she was presented with the emails, she read the forum comments.
And more importantly she spent tons of time on the phone with Earl trying to help him get humself under control and had considered him a friend. She saw the good side of Earl and that was a major reason why they continued with him even though the value to the brand was iffy.
So I can understand the reluctance to allow a player to be put into a situation that is geared towards intense conflict where so many words have been exchanged that it's not a professional rivalry anymore but almost outright hatred.
For a young company trying to project a positive image the last thing they want is one of their star players to be remembered most for having it out on camera with his hated rival. While that might make for great "tv" it's not what they want associated with their brand. I can respect that as a sponsor.
But here is what I would do because I respect the player as a human who should have the freedom to play who he wants to. I would have talked with John and made sure to extract a promise that his own demeanor would remain professional and thus the result would most likely be a a great match with both players staying cool OR if Danny were to get out of line John would be the shining example to the world of how a pro stays cool under fire.
I would definitely allow the match to happen.
Why does this match get so much attention when
the Shane Efren TAR hardly created a stir?
Have you looked at the Str8 Shots website to see how much money they are pouring into pool?
That's where I stopped reading.
The Shane/Efren all-around was one of the best match ups TAR has given us. The one pocket set is easily one of the greatest sets ever recorded.